Ask HN: Inexpensive large scale (100's of TB) storage options?
1–7 of 7 posts
Re: Ask HN: Inexpensive large scale (100's of TB) storage options?
#2Prices don't show here, but in general it's 15 times cheaper and 200 times less energy to use tape.
Re: Ask HN: Inexpensive large scale (100's of TB) storage options?
#3Re: Ask HN: Inexpensive large scale (100's of TB) storage options?
#4Need disk storage, would like to use 7200rpm for real-time access to logs, 15k for database/email apps
Would be a lot of fun to roll our own, but we are resource constrained, and while money is not an issue for us, I don't like complicated/expensive solutions, I like simple/inexpensive
Looking at NetApp for example, but having a hard time accepting the price point.
Re: Ask HN: Inexpensive large scale (100's of TB) storage options?
#5http://blog.backblaze.com/2009/09/01/petabytes-on-a-budget-h...
Re: Ask HN: Inexpensive large scale (100's of TB) storage options?
#6Closest company doing something like this is CORAID, which might be an option, but they have a number of proprietary interfaces/systems to buy in to.
Re: Ask HN: Inexpensive large scale (100's of TB) storage options?
#7@latch - Yes, we saw it - would be a fun project, but we are software hackers :-) There are also concerns about heat, vibration, hot swapping, etc. I would happily spend $78K for that same storage instead of $7.8K if it was reliable and was shipped as a complete package. Closest company doing something like this is CORAID, which might be an option, but they have a number of proprietary interfaces/systems to buy in to…