Once we can see them, it’s too late
scottaaronson.com
Once we can see them, it’s too late
1–10 of 114 posts
Re: Once we can see them, it’s too late
#2Re: Once we can see them, it’s too late
#3I'm tempted to whip up some numerical simulation to verify this to some extent...
> But here’s the interesting part: conditioned on all the steps having succeeded, we should find ourselves near the end of the useful lifetime of our planet’s star—simply because the more time is available on a given planet, the better the odds there. I.e., look around the universe and you should find that, on most of the planets where evolution achieves all the steps, it nearly runs out the planet’s clock in doing so.
Re: Once we can see them, it’s too late
#4And even of that is true, wouldn't we expect a significant fuzziness in that on the order of a millenium, where we see signs but haven't yet been engulfed?
Re: Once we can see them, it’s too late
#5Re: Once we can see them, it’s too late
#6Re: Once we can see them, it’s too late
#7Re: Once we can see them, it’s too late
#8Re: Once we can see them, it’s too late
#9This is the most profound thing I've read in a while. I'm tempted to whip up some numerical simulation to verify this to some extent... > But here’s the interesting part: conditioned on all the steps having succeeded, we should find ourselves near the end of the useful lifetime of our planet’s star—simply because the more time is available on a given planet, the better the odds there. I.e., look around the universe a…
Re: Once we can see them, it’s too late
#10This is the most profound thing I've read in a while. I'm tempted to whip up some numerical simulation to verify this to some extent... > But here’s the interesting part: conditioned on all the steps having succeeded, we should find ourselves near the end of the useful lifetime of our planet’s star—simply because the more time is available on a given planet, the better the odds there. I.e., look around the universe a…