Software breakthrough radically boosts the speed of nanopore DNA sequencers
1–10 of 57 posts
Re: Software breakthrough radically boosts the speed of nanopore DNA sequencers
#2Re: Software breakthrough radically boosts the speed of nanopore DNA sequencers
#3Re: Software breakthrough radically boosts the speed of nanopore DNA sequencers
#4Re: Software breakthrough radically boosts the speed of nanopore DNA sequencers
#5Note - this is NOT about whole genome sequencing.
Re: Software breakthrough radically boosts the speed of nanopore DNA sequencers
#6(Not to say it's not exciting: I find nanopore sequencing to be the most exciting thing in the field)
Re: Software breakthrough radically boosts the speed of nanopore DNA sequencers
#7The big impact from that paper is really summarized by this:
> WENGAN assembly of the haploid CHM13 sample achieved a contig NG50 of 80.64 Mb (NGA50: 59.59 Mb), which surpasses the contiguity of the current human reference genome (GRCh38 contig NG50: 57.88 Mb)
[0] https://www.nature.com/articles/s41587-020-00747-w
[1] Long and short reads, for example from Nanopore and Illumina, respectively
Re: Software breakthrough radically boosts the speed of nanopore DNA sequencers
#8If anyone is interested in DNA sequencing, I think the WENGAN paper [0] that came out the other day is pretty interesting too. They are using a hybrid input [1] in combination with their software package to reconstruct higher fidelity reference genomes. The big impact from that paper is really summarized by this: > WENGAN assembly of the haploid CHM13 sample achieved a contig NG50 of 80.64 Mb (NGA50: 59.59 Mb), which…
(I didn't look in the specifics of the problem so it may be completely wrong, but, you know, these days ...)
Re: Software breakthrough radically boosts the speed of nanopore DNA sequencers
#9Note - this is NOT about whole genome sequencing.
Can it be used instead of PCR Covid test for example?
the issue is that PCR still is the cheapest and fastest way to get the results.