The sparrow with four sexes (2016)
nature.com
The sparrow with four sexes (2016)
1–10 of 34 posts
Re: The sparrow with four sexes (2016)
#2Indeed it's one definition of a species that it's a population that can mate within it's group. So if they can no longer breed with each other, are they same species or not?
Re: The sparrow with four sexes (2016)
#3It sounds like they're evolving into separate species. Indeed it's one definition of a species that it's a population that can mate within it's group. So if they can no longer breed with each other, are they same species or not?
Re: The sparrow with four sexes (2016)
#4It sounds like they're evolving into separate species. Indeed it's one definition of a species that it's a population that can mate within it's group. So if they can no longer breed with each other, are they same species or not?
Re: The sparrow with four sexes (2016)
#5It sounds like they're evolving into separate species. Indeed it's one definition of a species that it's a population that can mate within it's group. So if they can no longer breed with each other, are they same species or not?
So it's not speciation, any more than sexes themselves are speciation.
Re: The sparrow with four sexes (2016)
#6Discussion at the time: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13027132
Re: The sparrow with four sexes (2016)
#7It sounds like they're evolving into separate species. Indeed it's one definition of a species that it's a population that can mate within it's group. So if they can no longer breed with each other, are they same species or not?
Re: The sparrow with four sexes (2016)
#8It sounds like they're evolving into separate species. Indeed it's one definition of a species that it's a population that can mate within it's group. So if they can no longer breed with each other, are they same species or not?
Ring species are a weird and fascinating corner case of that definition: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ring_species
Re: The sparrow with four sexes (2016)
#9Re: The sparrow with four sexes (2016)
#10Earlier quoted context omitted.
Ring species are a weird and fascinating corner case of that definition: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ring_species
Before the invention of radio this was a property of language as well. Famously you could walk from Paris to Rome and every village could speak comfortably and naturally with its neighbors, yet by the time you got to Rome they spoke a language essentially incomprehensible to Parisians.