We Rewrote Everything in $hotlang, and Our Startup Still Failed
1–10 of 41 posts
Re: We Rewrote Everything in $hotlang, and Our Startup Still Failed
#2The product itself was not used, dunno how folks assumed a rewrite would solve everything.
Re: We Rewrote Everything in $hotlang, and Our Startup Still Failed
#3Reads like a joke with no explanation for needing a rewrite in the first place. The product itself was not used, dunno how folks assumed a rewrite would solve everything.
Re: We Rewrote Everything in $hotlang, and Our Startup Still Failed
#4Reads like a joke with no explanation for needing a rewrite in the first place. The product itself was not used, dunno how folks assumed a rewrite would solve everything.
Because it is. It's satire. Also posted yesterday with Rust and Haskell.
Re: We Rewrote Everything in $hotlang, and Our Startup Still Failed
#5Reads like a joke with no explanation for needing a rewrite in the first place. The product itself was not used, dunno how folks assumed a rewrite would solve everything.
Re: We Rewrote Everything in $hotlang, and Our Startup Still Failed
#6Re: We Rewrote Everything in $hotlang, and Our Startup Still Failed
#7Also, I've seen the same stacks succeed and fail. The only common thing I can see is:
- when the tech team fully understand the stack they're using - when the tech team fully understand the product and business they're building (and can make appropriate trade offs)
There are a bunch of basic tech things. E.g. the underlying infrastructure has to be performance, scale, secure etc. There's also the issue of choosing a tech you can actually recruit for.