The Last Children of Down Syndrome

Special attention must be given to evaluating the morality of prenatal diagnostic techniques which enable the early detection of possible anomalies in the unborn child. In view of the complexity of these techniques, an accurate and systematic moral judgment is necessary. When they do not involve disproportionate risks for the child and the mother, and are meant to make possible early therapy or even to favour a serene and informed acceptance of the child not yet born, these techniques are morally licit. But since the possibilities of prenatal therapy are today still limited, it not infrequently happens that these techniques are used with a eugenic intention which accepts selective abortion in order to prevent the birth of children affected by various types of anomalies. Such an attitude is shameful and utterly reprehensible, since it presumes to measure the value of a human life only within the parameters of "normality" and physical well-being, thus opening the way to legitimizing infanticide and euthanasia as well. And yet the courage and the serenity with which so many of our brothers and sisters suffering from serious disabilities lead their lives when they are shown acceptance and love bears eloquent witness to what gives authentic value to life, and makes it, even in difficult conditions, something precious for them and for others. — John Paul II, Evangelium Vitae, 63

http://www.vatican.va/content/john-paul-ii/en/encyclicals/do...

Christe eleison

Hmm, so the testing isn't high sensitivity? It appears that the initial couple had the foetus tested and then did not abort but found that they had a child with Down Syndrome in the end. Interesting.

Prenatal testing is one of the few solutions to this "post-darwinian" world (not in the usual sense of the word) with its modern medicine that will result in mankind accumulating more and more genetic defects.

Though slightly more ethical from my point of view would be gene-editing to remove those defects, instead of just terminating the fetus.

Edit: Also I'm not talking about down syndrome specifically. There's a long list of genetic defects that modern medicine can correct for and thus removes evolutionary pressure (bad eyesight, allergies, etc.)

> will result in mankind accumulating more and more genetic defects

Why?

Unless the Down Syndrome patients themselves have children, then there wouldn't be an evolutionary impact.