Live data from Hacker News

Could a Peasant Defeat a Knight in Battle?

medievalists.net

1–10 of 326 posts

Re: Could a Peasant Defeat a Knight in Battle?

#4
It seems to me that a few peasants, or a group of them would ‘absolutely’ be able to defeat a knight in battle in a theoretical sense. You really only need to drag them off their horse and stab them.

But the situation is not like that in any real life instance, as the described situation in France depicts.

What the peasants are lacking isn’t so much arms and equipment, as discipline and organisation.

Re: Could a Peasant Defeat a Knight in Battle?

#5

Surprised there is no specific mention of the misericorde (a long, narrow dagger that could get between the gaps in armor plates or the holes in visors) : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Misericorde_(weapon)

That's an expensive non-food-producing piece of metal for an average medieval peasant to have lying around. Much more likely for your average knight to have one though, and as the link says it was used by Polish nobility.

Re: Could a Peasant Defeat a Knight in Battle?

#8
It’s not just weaponry, most of fighting is nutrition, I’m surprised the article doesn’t discuss that. Given that the article says the knights and their weaponry were correlated to wealth and power, I would expect the knights to be better fed than the peasants as well.

Re: Could a Peasant Defeat a Knight in Battle?

#10
What this article seems to barely touch upon is that the peasants spent most of their time eking out a living, the rich had free time and a culture of practicing their fighting skills at length, and from a young age, too. I would even say that the equipment was a secondary advantage, though still significant.
Post reply on HN