New Relic employees report unrest over work culture, CEO’s donations
1–10 of 61 posts
Re: New Relic employees report unrest over work culture, CEO’s donations
#2And before downvoting me, please note that I'm Jewish (ethnically speaking - I am more of a scientific pantheist in my actual views, but I digress) and bisexual. I do not support Cirne's charities or politics. I am merely calling into question the tactics that these employees are attempting to use to silence him.
Re: New Relic employees report unrest over work culture, CEO’s donations
#3Re: New Relic employees report unrest over work culture, CEO’s donations
#4If you were gay, would you be comfortable with an overtly homophobic boss?
Re: New Relic employees report unrest over work culture, CEO’s donations
#5Seems like he is being singled out for his outside-of-work religious beliefs. This is not a good look for those employees who believe in "inclusion".
Re: New Relic employees report unrest over work culture, CEO’s donations
#6Seems like he is being singled out for his outside-of-work religious beliefs. This is not a good look for those employees who believe in "inclusion".
Re: New Relic employees report unrest over work culture, CEO’s donations
#7What do the employees want to happen? Cirne to divorce or publicly condemn his wife over political contributions?
He can't forbid someone else from making political contributions.
Re: New Relic employees report unrest over work culture, CEO’s donations
#8Free speech doesn’t mean consequence free. If you were gay, would you be comfortable with an overtly homophobic boss?
Re: New Relic employees report unrest over work culture, CEO’s donations
#9Free speech doesn’t mean consequence free. If you were gay, would you be comfortable with an overtly homophobic boss?
Re: New Relic employees report unrest over work culture, CEO’s donations
#10I think the longstanding questions in this area are:
- are the activist employees just a vocal minority
- who will care (or support) if those activists are ignored -> who just wants to get back to work and focus on whatever it is that Company X does for profit.
That presents a somewhat cynical view of corporate culture. But, I'm very incredulous of arguments stating this isn't considered by companies that are large enough for employee activism to matter-matter.
CB essentially tried the usually avoided approach. It said it wouldn't support this stuff by implication (would stay "only mission focused) and gave healthy severance packages to those who wanted to leave. 5% of employees left, and the makeup of the 5% reflected that of the overall workforce. I have to think other companies paid attention to this outcome, although I wonder what internal polling and the like led to CB doing it.