EPA to Rescind Methane Regulations for Oil and Gas
1–10 of 213 posts
Re: EPA to Rescind Methane Regulations for Oil and Gas
#2Re: EPA to Rescind Methane Regulations for Oil and Gas
#3Re: EPA to Rescind Methane Regulations for Oil and Gas
#4Edit: I stand corrected.
It's annoying we're only making headway in transitioning off of fossil fuels due to luck (cost decline curve of renewables and batteries, making them cheaper than all other fossil and nuclear generation) and a pandemic instead of a concerted effort. "It is what it is."
EDIT: @natch: To refine my point, I don't intend to minimize the work of those performing R&D or implementation of renewables and associated technologies, but that we "lucked out" that we've gotten as far as we have with the minimal amount of resources we've put into the domain. We should be pouring significant amounts of global GDP and productivity into this transition.
[1] https://berniesanders.com/issues/green-new-deal/
[2] https://www.gatesnotes.com/Energy/Climate-and-COVID-19 (Bill Gates: "COVID-19 is awful. Climate change could be worse.")
Re: EPA to Rescind Methane Regulations for Oil and Gas
#5Methane is way worse as a greenhouse gas.
Re: EPA to Rescind Methane Regulations for Oil and Gas
#6Edit: I stand corrected.
Re: EPA to Rescind Methane Regulations for Oil and Gas
#7Another example of something that was so important they waited until less than 3 months before the election to do it. It hardly needs saying, but this is devastatingly bad environmental and climate policy.
Re: EPA to Rescind Methane Regulations for Oil and Gas
#8I suggest changing the headline to "outgoing administration continues to sabotage government for next administration as popularity continues to decline during incompetent response to viral pandemic". Another example of something that was so important they waited until less than 3 months before the election to do it. It hardly needs saying, but this is devastatingly bad environmental and climate policy.
1. You might be surprised at the election outcome. 2. The headline is based on the article, not what people think it should be.
Re: EPA to Rescind Methane Regulations for Oil and Gas
#9Edit: I stand corrected.
Bernie Sanders supported not only going 100% renewables as quickly as possible, but also banning hydraulic fracturing ("fracking") [1]. Silver lining is Aramco and COVID is doing what American's politicians didn't have the fortitude to do: force the scaling down of the US oil and gas industry and the inherent reduction in fossil demand from reducing commuting and air travel (respectively). I'm unsure how anyone can a…
Re: EPA to Rescind Methane Regulations for Oil and Gas
#10I suggest changing the headline to "outgoing administration continues to sabotage government for next administration as popularity continues to decline during incompetent response to viral pandemic". Another example of something that was so important they waited until less than 3 months before the election to do it. It hardly needs saying, but this is devastatingly bad environmental and climate policy.
Clearly this whole situation is political but I'd make 2 points. 1. You might be surprised at the election outcome. 2. The headline is based on the article, not what people think it should be.