Risk Assessment and Prioritization for Startups
docs.google.com
Risk Assessment and Prioritization for Startups
1–10 of 11 posts
Re: Risk Assessment and Prioritization for Startups
#2Re: Risk Assessment and Prioritization for Startups
#3Re: Risk Assessment and Prioritization for Startups
#4These are too many risks to think about. I doubt many successful founders had them as "risks", maybe can be called as an "issue". Apart from product market fit, are others really big of a risk?
I don't feel that 99% of what people call PMF really exists. I don't think of AI/Blockchain startups ever had PMF at Series A stage and none of the hardware/bio startups ever do.
Re: Risk Assessment and Prioritization for Startups
#5Also, this feels like it's forcing an external portfolio manager view on the internal operations of a startup. Nothing wrong with this - it's just odd to me.
Re: Risk Assessment and Prioritization for Startups
#6Re: Risk Assessment and Prioritization for Startups
#7These are too many risks to think about. I doubt many successful founders had them as "risks", maybe can be called as an "issue". Apart from product market fit, are others really big of a risk?
Re: Risk Assessment and Prioritization for Startups
#8Derisking business too early can be dangerous as well. Volatility unlocks opportunities. A little bit of noise in the system is the secret sauce.
Re: Risk Assessment and Prioritization for Startups
#9These are too many risks to think about. I doubt many successful founders had them as "risks", maybe can be called as an "issue". Apart from product market fit, are others really big of a risk?
PMF is really just a way to say "I de-risked these key areas", right? I think it does the best to encapsulate the idea of getting important things right but it's not the whole puzzle.
After PMF popularized, we had tons of people talking about Product/Channel Fit and Message/Market Fit, etc., since you need acquisition channels to work to fulfill demand and solid messaging to drive demand to begin with. Being lazy with channels is a big risk, IMO as a marketer. It's especially risky for bootstrapped startups to waste time on the wrong channels.
Re: Risk Assessment and Prioritization for Startups
#10To add: Choosing which risks to tackle should definitely be weighted by difficulty, impact and available resources. Also, this feels like it's forcing an external portfolio manager view on the internal operations of a startup. Nothing wrong with this - it's just odd to me.
Using the example from the linked material: surely if you can't swim, learning may be quite difficult.