It’s Time for Wristwatches to Get Smarter
1–10 of 34 posts
Re: It’s Time for Wristwatches to Get Smarter
#2While we're still using physically constrained screens to show information, I doubt wristwatches will make a comeback. Even if we could fit the functionality of an iPhone into them, the screen is just too tiny to be really useful.
Somewhat related: A friend once told me that the cut-off age for wristwatches is 25 years. People that are older have one and younger people generally don't. I found this to be pretty accurate.
Edit: Just watched the video, too. The one-button design seems to be an ill-fated attempt at apple-like simplicity.
Re: It’s Time for Wristwatches to Get Smarter
#3Re: It’s Time for Wristwatches to Get Smarter
#4Watches as companion devices seem like a straight-forward upselling move. I don't think it'll work. While we're still using physically constrained screens to show information, I doubt wristwatches will make a comeback. Even if we could fit the functionality of an iPhone into them, the screen is just too tiny to be really useful. Somewhat related: A friend once told me that the cut-off age for wristwatches is 25 years…
We designed inPulse to be useful in the 1-to-10 second timeframe. We knew that if it got too complicated or required too much fiddling, people would just pull out their cellphone. With one button, you can navigate with gloves, when your hands are wet, under the table...etc.
That's why it has one button.
Re: It’s Time for Wristwatches to Get Smarter
#5Why not just make a nice stylish watch that also acts as a voice interface to my phone? Or a watch that can accept a SIM card for those occasions when carrying my smartphone is too cumbersome (seems that this might be especially useful for ladies who want to wear evening dresses that don't accommodate full-size smartphones).
Re: It’s Time for Wristwatches to Get Smarter
#6I remember it was expensive and nobody really wanted it.
Re: It’s Time for Wristwatches to Get Smarter
#7- Sincerely, people under 25
Re: It’s Time for Wristwatches to Get Smarter
#8Didn't MSFT try to do this like 5 years ago with the smart watch? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smart_Personal_Objects_Technolo... I remember it was expensive and nobody really wanted it.
Apple's already half way there with the Nano.
If you integrated this with your other services: voice (just to know when you're getting a call, missed calls, voice mail), sms, twitter, email, facebook -- now you may have a somewhat interesting device. The tough part now though is that everyone has a smartphone... is this device necessary anymore?
Although if you could add a lot of biometric feedback that would be nice. And also solar powered so it had crazy battery life. My current watch has been going 10 years on solar power w/o a charge.
Re: It’s Time for Wristwatches to Get Smarter
#9Who needs it? Awkward, annoying, and I find too many clocks in my life already. Remember when Daylight Savings changed? How many did you set? I counted 13 in my house. Why does the freaking stove need a clock?