Android Lighthouse: Android Qt Port
code.google.com
Android Lighthouse: Android Qt Port
1–10 of 28 posts
Re: Android Lighthouse: Android Qt Port
#2Re: Android Lighthouse: Android Qt Port
#3The real question is how screwed are C++ developers in general?
MSFT's offering is switch to managed C++/C++ CLR and use WPF - two doomed technologies together. Or there is always MFC
Apple say don't even try with C++ just switch to objective C
Your only choice is GTK (from C) and plug into the rich commercial opportunities of Gnome and Linux on the desktop.
So is C++ on the desktop dead?
Re: Android Lighthouse: Android Qt Port
#4Interesting. Apparently, this project on puts self-contained full-screen Qt apps onto Android machines via NDK [1]. However, I find nothing about Android integration on the level of Intents and Activities, not even whether that's planned. 1. http://code.google.com/p/android-lighthouse/wiki/QADK
Lighthouse isn't really a full Android-Java/NDK integration suite, although it's a very good foundation for one.
Re: Android Lighthouse: Android Qt Port
#5Re: Android Lighthouse: Android Qt Port
#6Doesn't matter - Nokia will cancel Qt in the next round of budgets. The real question is how screwed are C++ developers in general? MSFT's offering is switch to managed C++/C++ CLR and use WPF - two doomed technologies together. Or there is always MFC Apple say don't even try with C++ just switch to objective C Your only choice is GTK (from C) and plug into the rich commercial opportunities of Gnome and Linux on the…
Re: Android Lighthouse: Android Qt Port
#7Doesn't matter - Nokia will cancel Qt in the next round of budgets. The real question is how screwed are C++ developers in general? MSFT's offering is switch to managed C++/C++ CLR and use WPF - two doomed technologies together. Or there is always MFC Apple say don't even try with C++ just switch to objective C Your only choice is GTK (from C) and plug into the rich commercial opportunities of Gnome and Linux on the…
Re: Android Lighthouse: Android Qt Port
#8Doesn't matter - Nokia will cancel Qt in the next round of budgets. The real question is how screwed are C++ developers in general? MSFT's offering is switch to managed C++/C++ CLR and use WPF - two doomed technologies together. Or there is always MFC Apple say don't even try with C++ just switch to objective C Your only choice is GTK (from C) and plug into the rich commercial opportunities of Gnome and Linux on the…
The difficult part is that there is no current team to do so, but some of the current devs may be willing to continue work in a leadership position of the OSS effort after the next rounds of layoffs.
Alternatively, a company could be formed (YC12?) to continue coding QT, and offer support + training. Hell, I'm tempted ;)
Re: Android Lighthouse: Android Qt Port
#9Doesn't matter - Nokia will cancel Qt in the next round of budgets. The real question is how screwed are C++ developers in general? MSFT's offering is switch to managed C++/C++ CLR and use WPF - two doomed technologies together. Or there is always MFC Apple say don't even try with C++ just switch to objective C Your only choice is GTK (from C) and plug into the rich commercial opportunities of Gnome and Linux on the…
A developer who is so dependent on one language/framework that he cannot learn another in a reasonable amount of time is one I have no sympathy for.
We only just got done porting them all from Fortran!
Re: Android Lighthouse: Android Qt Port
#10Earlier quoted context omitted.
A developer who is so dependent on one language/framework that he cannot learn another in a reasonable amount of time is one I have no sympathy for.
Learning Java is easy - porting 20years of libraries from C/C++ to Java is trickier. We only just got done porting them all from Fortran!