Aldous Huxley Foresaw America’s Pill-Popping Addiction
1–10 of 187 posts
Re: Aldous Huxley Foresaw America’s Pill-Popping Addiction
#2https://www.sparknotes.com/lit/451/key-questions/why-does-mi...
Re: Aldous Huxley Foresaw America’s Pill-Popping Addiction
#3Re: Aldous Huxley Foresaw America’s Pill-Popping Addiction
#4And 1984 foresaw speech police, wrong-think, and cultural cleansing yada yada....
Re: Aldous Huxley Foresaw America’s Pill-Popping Addiction
#5Re: Aldous Huxley Foresaw America’s Pill-Popping Addiction
#6Re: Aldous Huxley Foresaw America’s Pill-Popping Addiction
#7--
I tend to find simplistic pro and anti substance screeds yawn-inducing. All psychoactive substances, whether legal or not, whether they have physical dependency issues or not, whether they are used by rich people or poor people, have a unique set of consciousness-altering properties in the short-term and long-term. They give with one hand and take away with the other.
Whether something is useful for short-term or long-term use is a profoundly individual choice that is best made with as much information available as possible, and far separated from moralizing judgement. And sometimes, far from the pharma companies and current psychiatric fad.
--
I don't see much new in this article. It's true lots of people are popping pills to deal with late capitalism, but maybe that's what a lot of humans have to do in late capitalism til we figure out something better.
Re: Aldous Huxley Foresaw America’s Pill-Popping Addiction
#8Re: Aldous Huxley Foresaw America’s Pill-Popping Addiction
#9As for Valium, it seems odd this article even makes a big deal about it. Valium (and benzodiazepines in general) aren't prescribed as much these days because of their addictive potential. Their spike of popularity came and went in a few decades, roughly 1960-1980. Benzos are still popular in illicit use, but a key point of Soma was that it wasn't illicit---it was sanctioned by the state.
Re: Aldous Huxley Foresaw America’s Pill-Popping Addiction
#10The contemporary family of drugs would have been barbiturates, and in the very early days of their use. Well before we knew how bad that they were in regards to addition and withdrawl. Valium is a benzodiazepine, and those come much later, again we don't find out how bad the withdrawal from them is till much later. In some regards benzodiazepines end up replacing barbiturates not for consumer heath reasons rather for patent and profit reasons because as it turns out both are fairly damaging.