Maybe NYC could start with a simple URL
1–10 of 38 posts
Re: Maybe NYC could start with a simple URL
#2Re: Maybe NYC could start with a simple URL
#3Re: Maybe NYC could start with a simple URL
#4.../html/home/home.shtml ...there's a certain symmetry, don't you think?
Re: Maybe NYC could start with a simple URL
#5Re: Maybe NYC could start with a simple URL
#6Re: Maybe NYC could start with a simple URL
#7Can someone explain why this is? You would think that the developers building it would say, "hey, let's make these urls a bit more friendly..."
Re: Maybe NYC could start with a simple URL
#8Re: Maybe NYC could start with a simple URL
#9Can someone explain why this is? You would think that the developers building it would say, "hey, let's make these urls a bit more friendly..."
P.S. Find the Y2K compliance code. It doesn't work, but working is not the reason they needed Y2K compliance code in the first place -- it is just another checkbox to fill.
Re: Maybe NYC could start with a simple URL
#10Can someone explain why this is? You would think that the developers building it would say, "hey, let's make these urls a bit more friendly..."
The first html is the generic static assets folder, and the second is the local projects' folder full of assets.
Poor developers never had a chance.
www.nyc.gov/html/housinginfo/html/home/home.shtml
www.nyc.gov/html/dob/html/home/home.shtml
www.nyc.gov/html/planyc2030/html/home/home.shtml
etc.