Truckers sue California, say new gig economy law would kill 70k jobs
1–10 of 120 posts
Re: Truckers sue California, say new gig economy law would kill 70k jobs
#2Re: Truckers sue California, say new gig economy law would kill 70k jobs
#3Re: Truckers sue California, say new gig economy law would kill 70k jobs
#4> performing work "outside the usual course of the hiring entity's business
That bans subcontracting, no? It's a common, long established practice in a lot of industries.
Re: Truckers sue California, say new gig economy law would kill 70k jobs
#5Re: Truckers sue California, say new gig economy law would kill 70k jobs
#6This element of the law is an odd standard: > performing work "outside the usual course of the hiring entity's business That bans subcontracting, no? It's a common, long established practice in a lot of industries.
Re: Truckers sue California, say new gig economy law would kill 70k jobs
#7This element of the law is an odd standard: > performing work "outside the usual course of the hiring entity's business That bans subcontracting, no? It's a common, long established practice in a lot of industries.
It doesn't ban anything, it just says that certain types of people working in certain arrangements can't be deprived of employment benefits.
Re: Truckers sue California, say new gig economy law would kill 70k jobs
#8Well, now we know what Yang will be talking about in the debate next week.
Re: Truckers sue California, say new gig economy law would kill 70k jobs
#9Pretty comical that it ended up being California regulation that would put truckers out of work instead of Silicon Valley automation.
Re: Truckers sue California, say new gig economy law would kill 70k jobs
#10> Many would have to abandon $150,000 investments in clean trucks
I read this as: truckers will no longer be expect to supply their own $150,000 trucks to get into the business.
> and the right to set their own schedules
I read this as: truckers will no longer be expected to "comply with the laws, wink wink" to meet impossible schedules in ways that legally aren't the contracting company's fault.