The Deceptive Simplicity of ‘Peanuts’
theparisreview.org
The Deceptive Simplicity of ‘Peanuts’
1–10 of 19 posts
Re: The Deceptive Simplicity of ‘Peanuts’
#2Re: The Deceptive Simplicity of ‘Peanuts’
#3Re: The Deceptive Simplicity of ‘Peanuts’
#4Re: The Deceptive Simplicity of ‘Peanuts’
#5Later I read a collection of Peanuts from around 1955 and it was incredible. Kinda like early Simpsons
Re: The Deceptive Simplicity of ‘Peanuts’
#6Chris Ware is a fantastic author of comics. His "Building Stories" is truly a masterpiece of the form and I highly recommend it to all. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Building_Stories
Re: The Deceptive Simplicity of ‘Peanuts’
#7Re: The Deceptive Simplicity of ‘Peanuts’
#8Schulz should have quit in the 70's. He dragged it on for far too long.
Edit: he died the day before.
Re: The Deceptive Simplicity of ‘Peanuts’
#9Schulz should have quit in the 70's. He dragged it on for far too long.
He would have died sooner. I say that only partly in jest. When he was going to retire, he wrote the last strip ahead of publication and people were wondering what it would be. It was basically a thank you to the fans. He died the day it ran in the papers. Edit: he died the day before.
Re: The Deceptive Simplicity of ‘Peanuts’
#10I grew up reading newspaper comics during the “Calvin and Hobbes” era. I read Peanuts but I never understood its appeal as seemed extremely dull. Later I read a collection of Peanuts from around 1955 and it was incredible. Kinda like early Simpsons