Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Google Gives $100 Million Award to Outgoing CEO

online.wsj.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

1–10 of 11 posts

Re: Google Gives $100 Million Award to Outgoing CEO

#5

Post by mistermann »

joshfraser wrote: post #4

Keep in mind Eric has been taking a $1/year salary since joining Google. Not that he has suffered financially at all due to his equity holding in the company, but I doubt anyone would argue this is well deserved.

I don't know, I would say it's certainly debatable. Would things really be that different had he not been there? Could someone else done a similar job for say, only $50 million (and the same compensation due to options)?

I don't have any particular opinion in this instance, but discussions of this nature seem to be forbidden for some reason.

Re: Google Gives $100 Million Award to Outgoing CEO

#7

Post by SoftwareMaven »

mistermann wrote: post #5
joshfraser wrote: post #4

Keep in mind Eric has been taking a $1/year salary since joining Google. Not that he has suffered financially at all due to his equity holding in the company, but I doubt anyone would argue this is well deserved.

I don't know, I would say it's certainly debatable. Would things really be that different had he not been there? Could someone else done a similar job for say, only $50 million (and the same compensation due to options)? I don't have any particular opinion in this instance, but discussions of this nature seem to be forbidden for some reason.

I don't think you can second guess like that, since there is no way to answer the question. In a world of infinite possibilities (second guessing the past), everything is possible but meaningless.

All you can do is ask "Did he accomplish his job in such a way as to deserve earning $100M over the course of 10 years?" I think the answer to that is probably yes.

Re: Google Gives $100 Million Award to Outgoing CEO

#10

Post by jacquesm »

SoftwareMaven wrote: post #7
mistermann wrote: post #5

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't know, I would say it's certainly debatable. Would things really be that different had he not been there? Could someone else done a similar job for say, only $50 million (and the same compensation due to options)? I don't have any particular opinion in this instance, but discussions of this nature seem to be forbidden for some reason.

I don't think you can second guess like that, since there is no way to answer the question. In a world of infinite possibilities (second guessing the past), everything is possible but meaningless. All you can do is ask "Did he accomplish his job in such a way as to deserve earning $100M over the course of 10 years?" I think the answer to that is probably yes.

> In a world of infinite possibilities (second guessing the past), everything is possible but meaningless.

But we don't actually live in a world with infinite possibilities. It's easy to think that we do but in practice our possibilities are circumscribed in many ways.

Who knows, without knowing exactly which decisions that Schmidt made led to which gains for google it is very hard to point out if this is due to his presence or not. On the whole the company is much better off than when he joined but it seems strange to lay all the credit for that at the door of the CEO, lots of people at google played a role in that and I'm pretty sure they won't be compensated to match if they decide to step down.

Post reply on HN