Japan’s Hayabusa2 spacecraft grabs close-up thirty feet above asteroid
1–10 of 98 posts
Re: Japan’s Hayabusa2 spacecraft grabs close-up thirty feet above asteroid
#2Re: Japan’s Hayabusa2 spacecraft grabs close-up thirty feet above asteroid
#3Why are the pictures so fuzzy?
Edit: Thank you to all the other posters who wrote way better answers with more information!
Re: Japan’s Hayabusa2 spacecraft grabs close-up thirty feet above asteroid
#4Why are the pictures so fuzzy?
Again ultra dark, so the camera needs to have an incredibly sensitive sensor.
And incredible motion, the spacecraft is whipping by the asteroid quickly.. so you'd need a fast shutter speed to get sharp detail. Which is made difficult by the lighting conditions.
No human photographer on the shutter button. Way too far away for that.
Incredibly challenging photographic environment.
Re: Japan’s Hayabusa2 spacecraft grabs close-up thirty feet above asteroid
#5Re: Japan’s Hayabusa2 spacecraft grabs close-up thirty feet above asteroid
#6Wonder what material that greyish rock looking stuff on the surface is.
Re: Japan’s Hayabusa2 spacecraft grabs close-up thirty feet above asteroid
#7Why are the pictures so fuzzy?
Insane Contrast ratio - ultra bright sunlight when the sun gets in the frame (no atmosphere to diffuse light) plus ultra dark hard shadows as the light source is millions of miles away, and again no atmosphere to diffuse the light. Again ultra dark, so the camera needs to have an incredibly sensitive sensor. And incredible motion, the spacecraft is whipping by the asteroid quickly.. so you'd need a fast shutter speed…
Could the spacecraft—just in theory—introduce an atmosphere? Maybe not this spacecraft, but if we’re riding around in the starship Enterprise and want to get better snaps of asteroids, would it be a good idea to just send out a big pair of glass hemispheres, encapsulate the asteroid with them, pump them full of air, and then take a picture of the asteroid-capsule system?
Alternately, could you stick something really good at diffusing light—like a big block of aerogel—between the sun and the asteroid?
Re: Japan’s Hayabusa2 spacecraft grabs close-up thirty feet above asteroid
#8Earlier quoted context omitted.
Insane Contrast ratio - ultra bright sunlight when the sun gets in the frame (no atmosphere to diffuse light) plus ultra dark hard shadows as the light source is millions of miles away, and again no atmosphere to diffuse the light. Again ultra dark, so the camera needs to have an incredibly sensitive sensor. And incredible motion, the spacecraft is whipping by the asteroid quickly.. so you'd need a fast shutter speed…
> no atmosphere to diffuse light Could the spacecraft—just in theory— introduce an atmosphere? Maybe not this spacecraft, but if we’re riding around in the starship Enterprise and want to get better snaps of asteroids, would it be a good idea to just send out a big pair of glass hemispheres, encapsulate the asteroid with them, pump them full of air, and then take a picture of the asteroid-capsule system? Alternately,…
Re: Japan’s Hayabusa2 spacecraft grabs close-up thirty feet above asteroid
#9Earlier quoted context omitted.
Insane Contrast ratio - ultra bright sunlight when the sun gets in the frame (no atmosphere to diffuse light) plus ultra dark hard shadows as the light source is millions of miles away, and again no atmosphere to diffuse the light. Again ultra dark, so the camera needs to have an incredibly sensitive sensor. And incredible motion, the spacecraft is whipping by the asteroid quickly.. so you'd need a fast shutter speed…
> no atmosphere to diffuse light Could the spacecraft—just in theory— introduce an atmosphere? Maybe not this spacecraft, but if we’re riding around in the starship Enterprise and want to get better snaps of asteroids, would it be a good idea to just send out a big pair of glass hemispheres, encapsulate the asteroid with them, pump them full of air, and then take a picture of the asteroid-capsule system? Alternately,…
Or just do the science with the camera you have and ignore the fact that human viewers don't like the results aesthetically.