Live data from Hacker News

Falsehoods programmers believe about Unix time

alexwlchan.net

1–10 of 275 posts

Re: Falsehoods programmers believe about Unix time

#5

> But it’s unsatisfying to say “this is false” without explaining why Got my upvote. I can't stand the "falsehoods programmers believe" articles that make a point out of not backing up any of their claims.

Is this really a problem? The "falsehood programmers believe" articles I remember reading all list things that were either obvious, or obvious in retrospect.

Re: Falsehoods programmers believe about Unix time

#7

> But it’s unsatisfying to say “this is false” without explaining why Got my upvote. I can't stand the "falsehoods programmers believe" articles that make a point out of not backing up any of their claims.

I blame (perhaps unfairly) this idea that people write a lot of programming related articles and blogs as resume fodder, and not really for an audience beyond that.

I've run across so many "how to do" and it's the same example code and you can see where it has skewed over time... and evolved into something that the author really doesn't understand.

Same goes with some of the fundamentals and gee wiz "falsehoods" and such articles.

I appreciate the folks taking the time to write it but if they're not going to tell me why:

1.) I don't know if they even know / gave me the right idea.

2.) If I can't grok why then I'm not going to really understand it...

Re: Falsehoods programmers believe about Unix time

#8

> But it’s unsatisfying to say “this is false” without explaining why Got my upvote. I can't stand the "falsehoods programmers believe" articles that make a point out of not backing up any of their claims.

Yeah, the standard falsehoods listicle would have ended right before that line.

Timekeeping is strange. Makes me want to store everything in TAI and then convert it for display.

Post reply on HN