Live data from Hacker News

A Conspiracy to Kill IE6

blog.chriszacharias.com

1–10 of 386 posts

Re: A Conspiracy to Kill IE6

#2
Oh my, this is amazing.

I'm not sure the engineers realized despite their secrecy, it would be noticed by the press immediately after deploy.

But the best part is how Google engineers immediately on seeing it figured "oh yeah, we should do that too" (although they apparently got the necessary approvals however that was done at Google, it was easier to do because they figured "well, youtube must have done due dillegence before doing it.")

Amazing!

I don't know how they didn't all get fired. Like, ALL of em, including everyone who set up the special "OldTuber" priv long before.

But... it worked! This is a hacker story for the history books, it sounds like the kind of thing programmers did 20+ years ago for nothing except the reward of doing it right (against their own career interests), that I feel like doesn't happen so much in a more professionalized industry.

Re: A Conspiracy to Kill IE6

#7
I loved the part when the Docs team added their own because they were "presumably under the mistaken assumption that we had done our diligence and had received all of the necessary approvals....Amazingly, we had somehow bypassed detection as the originators of the IE6 banner inside of Google."

Re: A Conspiracy to Kill IE6

#9
I remember using those banners are reasons to not support IE6 in our client projects at the time. It took a bit longer for it to actually fade away for us, but it's great to hear the story behind those banners.

Re: A Conspiracy to Kill IE6

#10
Is this a charming story about helping users upgrade to modern web browsers or a dark parable about the influence of tech giants?

Compare with ex-Firefox VP Johnathan Nightingale's recent thread about Google "amateur hour" and "oopses" that only affected Firefox:

https://twitter.com/johnath/status/1116871231792455686

Post reply on HN