Live data from Hacker News

Breaking Out of Docker via RunC

twistlock.com

1–10 of 21 posts

Re: Breaking Out of Docker via RunC

#5

why isn't docker and k8s banned by security teams? these are clearly broken abstractions that would violate most security audits immediately

We think of these as deployment abstractions that provide no security value. This is why services like Amazon’s ECS Fargate pair 1 task definition (usually a single container) to a single EC2 host for isolation.

Re: Breaking Out of Docker via RunC

#6
This is a really great exploration of this vulnerability.

It makes me sad that lxc doesn't get more love. LXC has had unprivileged containers as its default for 5+ years now. Its a really solid tool set that has mostly been passed over for lack of marketing.

Re: Breaking Out of Docker via RunC

#7

why isn't docker and k8s banned by security teams? these are clearly broken abstractions that would violate most security audits immediately

Because the abstractions are good and the implementation gets better over time as with any other software. Obviously truly sensitive data should be handled on separate physical nodes (defense in depth).

Re: Breaking Out of Docker via RunC

#10
post #6

This is a really great exploration of this vulnerability. It makes me sad that lxc doesn't get more love. LXC has had unprivileged containers as its default for 5+ years now. Its a really solid tool set that has mostly been passed over for lack of marketing.

The reason Docker gets so much attention is its container image repository infrastructure. I'm sure LXC has something similar, but Docker's is built-in and has almost anything you can think of. (Of course, this presents other security/trust issues).
Post reply on HN