Live data from Hacker News

Falsehoods Programmers Believe About Phone Numbers (2016)

github.com

1–10 of 209 posts

Re: Falsehoods Programmers Believe About Phone Numbers (2016)

#4
I find this category of posts ("falsehoods programmers believe about X") to be patronizing and unhelpful. Most of these lists (this one included) don't give good explanations and don't have guidelines for how to avoid the problems that are highlighted. It's usually just a list of condescending gotchas.

Re: Falsehoods Programmers Believe About Phone Numbers (2016)

#7
"Users will only store phone numbers in your product's phone number fields"

Not entirely sure what this point is trying to achieve. Do you read a birthday field expecting a phone number 99% of the time? Should you read a phone number field expecting an email address? And at what point in that process did you decide that not having data validation on both ends was a good idea?

Re: Falsehoods Programmers Believe About Phone Numbers (2016)

#8
post #4

I find this category of posts ("falsehoods programmers believe about X") to be patronizing and unhelpful. Most of these lists (this one included) don't give good explanations and don't have guidelines for how to avoid the problems that are highlighted. It's usually just a list of condescending gotchas.

Isnt every language unique?

I feel like this teaches a way of thinking.

Post reply on HN