Falsehoods Programmers Believe About Phone Numbers (2016)
1–10 of 209 posts
Re: Falsehoods Programmers Believe About Phone Numbers (2016)
#2Re: Falsehoods Programmers Believe About Phone Numbers (2016)
#3Re: Falsehoods Programmers Believe About Phone Numbers (2016)
#4Re: Falsehoods Programmers Believe About Phone Numbers (2016)
#5Vietnam just removed a few months ago one digit of all the mobile phones making all the previous number recorded for the country invalid.
Re: Falsehoods Programmers Believe About Phone Numbers (2016)
#6Re: Falsehoods Programmers Believe About Phone Numbers (2016)
#7Not entirely sure what this point is trying to achieve. Do you read a birthday field expecting a phone number 99% of the time? Should you read a phone number field expecting an email address? And at what point in that process did you decide that not having data validation on both ends was a good idea?
Re: Falsehoods Programmers Believe About Phone Numbers (2016)
#8I find this category of posts ("falsehoods programmers believe about X") to be patronizing and unhelpful. Most of these lists (this one included) don't give good explanations and don't have guidelines for how to avoid the problems that are highlighted. It's usually just a list of condescending gotchas.
I feel like this teaches a way of thinking.
Re: Falsehoods Programmers Believe About Phone Numbers (2016)
#9Re: Falsehoods Programmers Believe About Phone Numbers (2016)
#10Alright, guess I'll be using email verification