1 in 5 Facebook Employees Worked at Google
blog.redfin.com
1 in 5 Facebook Employees Worked at Google
1–10 of 37 posts
Re: 1 in 5 Facebook Employees Worked at Google
#2Re: 1 in 5 Facebook Employees Worked at Google
#3Re: 1 in 5 Facebook Employees Worked at Google
#4Re: 1 in 5 Facebook Employees Worked at Google
#5It isn't about imagination. It is the cycle of the valley. Mature companies have employees go to found their own companies or join other pre-IPO startups. Working for Google you'll have a great career and quality of life but going to Facebook has the potential to make you quite a bit more money through equity.
Re: 1 in 5 Facebook Employees Worked at Google
#6Re: 1 in 5 Facebook Employees Worked at Google
#7The bottom line is this - if you were to place a bet (as in betting your career) on which company will be dominant 20 years from now and which will become yet another dying Internet fad, I'd bet in favor of Facebook. Absolutely everyone overestimates Google's chances of continuing to dominate forever.
Re: 1 in 5 Facebook Employees Worked at Google
#8The bottom line is this - if you were to place a bet (as in betting your career) on which company will be dominant 20 years from now and which will become yet another dying Internet fad, I'd bet in favor of Facebook. Absolutely everyone overestimates Google's chances of continuing to dominate forever.
Re: 1 in 5 Facebook Employees Worked at Google
#9The bottom line is this - if you were to place a bet (as in betting your career) on which company will be dominant 20 years from now and which will become yet another dying Internet fad, I'd bet in favor of Facebook. Absolutely everyone overestimates Google's chances of continuing to dominate forever.
Re: 1 in 5 Facebook Employees Worked at Google
#10The bottom line is this - if you were to place a bet (as in betting your career) on which company will be dominant 20 years from now and which will become yet another dying Internet fad, I'd bet in favor of Facebook. Absolutely everyone overestimates Google's chances of continuing to dominate forever.
You statement is ambiguous; it doesn't say whether facebook will be the former or the latter. (my take is it could easily go either way).