Destruction of evidence charges filed for remotely wiping iPhone
dailygazette.com
Destruction of evidence charges filed for remotely wiping iPhone
1–10 of 160 posts
Re: Destruction of evidence charges filed for remotely wiping iPhone
#2Re: Destruction of evidence charges filed for remotely wiping iPhone
#3I guess the police will learn to put the phone in a Faraday cage as soon as it's seized
Re: Destruction of evidence charges filed for remotely wiping iPhone
#4I guess the police will learn to put the phone in a Faraday cage as soon as it's seized
Sell 'mobile' Faraday cages one for every squad car... Profit?
Re: Destruction of evidence charges filed for remotely wiping iPhone
#5I'm a little surprised the police don't have faraday bags or a room to store evidence in that doesn't allow radio signals in.
Re: Destruction of evidence charges filed for remotely wiping iPhone
#6Re: Destruction of evidence charges filed for remotely wiping iPhone
#7Re: Destruction of evidence charges filed for remotely wiping iPhone
#8What is the penalty for destruction of evidence? If it's less than the crime at hand, it's logical to wipe. I'm a little surprised the police don't have faraday bags or a room to store evidence in that doesn't allow radio signals in.
According to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spoliation_of_evidence#Tamperi... , in my non-lawyerly (hence probably imprecise) summary, the act of destroying evidence can be regarded as incriminating evidence.
Re: Destruction of evidence charges filed for remotely wiping iPhone
#9What is the penalty for destruction of evidence? If it's less than the crime at hand, it's logical to wipe. I'm a little surprised the police don't have faraday bags or a room to store evidence in that doesn't allow radio signals in.
Re: Destruction of evidence charges filed for remotely wiping iPhone
#10What if I use the gmail/slack/whatsapp website instead of the app, and remotely log the phone out of google/etc if my device is seized. That way the data was only stored in RAM, and they shouldn't be able to access it once they get into the phone. Does that count as destruction of evidence?
You can quibble over technical details, but at some point a judge will be asked if it fits the charge, and make a layman decision, not a programmer's one.