The Dangerous Fetishization of ‘Hustle Porn’
melmagazine.com
The Dangerous Fetishization of ‘Hustle Porn’
1–10 of 170 posts
Re: The Dangerous Fetishization of ‘Hustle Porn’
#2Re: The Dangerous Fetishization of ‘Hustle Porn’
#3Re: The Dangerous Fetishization of ‘Hustle Porn’
#4I disagree with this.
Re: The Dangerous Fetishization of ‘Hustle Porn’
#5I disagree with this.
As others said, why? Give us some reasons.
Re: The Dangerous Fetishization of ‘Hustle Porn’
#6Re: The Dangerous Fetishization of ‘Hustle Porn’
#7edit: last sentence
Re: The Dangerous Fetishization of ‘Hustle Porn’
#8Re: The Dangerous Fetishization of ‘Hustle Porn’
#9The problem with hustle porn is really how little emphasis is put on luck. They show a grind that translates directly into results, not really talking about dealing with failure due to things outside of one's control. Yes hard work gets you primed for new opportunities, but luck still plays a role in which opportunities you come across.
Re: The Dangerous Fetishization of ‘Hustle Porn’
#10But there is a lot wrong with the idea that you need to work until your health is impacted to succeed; if you need to work that hard, something else is off - the idea isn't good enough, you're attacking it in the wrong way, whatever.
To me this ties into the gross, pervasive trend of wantrepreneurism. Shark Tank, Zuck, Elon Musk - being a founder has never been sexier, never been more interesting or lucrative. In the wake of that, WeWork and GaryV and a whole bunch of people are selling the idea that regardless of how bad your idea is or how unfit you are to be an entrepreneur, all you need is access or hustle to succeed. And that's awful, awful advice.
As income inequality continues to grow, I expect this to get worse and worse.