Live data from Hacker News

W3C Says HTML5 Isn’t Ready for the Web

mashable.com

1–10 of 11 posts

Re: W3C Says HTML5 Isn’t Ready for the Web

#5
post #3

Is it me or are some words missing in the 2nd paragraph? It makes it hard to follow the article.

It is an example of bad online journalism.

Apparently the writer is quoting an official, but to find who he is quoting you have to click on the link "today". So you naturally think "today" is probably a link to the event, so it ends up being an article with an unnamed quote.

Re: W3C Says HTML5 Isn’t Ready for the Web

#7
post #3

Is it me or are some words missing in the 2nd paragraph? It makes it hard to follow the article.

Yup, the start of the first sentence should read "An official from the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) told reporters today" rather than "An today".

Bad markup being the culprit - somewhat ironically.

Re: W3C Says HTML5 Isn’t Ready for the Web

#8
...until then, officials say Flash and Silverlight are still going to remain approved and viable web technologies.

Who are these officials that approve of Flash and Silverlight as web technologies superior to HTML5? I've never heard of a Flash working group at the W3C. The closest I found is someone asking for W3C involvement in 2008:

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/311802/w3c-involvement-in...

Re: W3C Says HTML5 Isn’t Ready for the Web

#10
Seriously!?

The articles cites an "official" of the W3C and not the name of a person. Was it someone of important such as Ian Hickson or was it just some bureaucrat or intern?

Who made these statements matters greatly and defines the line between news and non-news. This is complete non-news unless it was a person highly involved with defining or implementing the spec.

The fact that the author cited Silverlight smells very fishy to me.

This title and the entire article is just pure unadulterated linkbait.

Post reply on HN