ARM: “RISC-V Architecture: Understand the Facts”
riscv-basics.com
ARM: “RISC-V Architecture: Understand the Facts”
1–10 of 123 posts
Re: ARM: “RISC-V Architecture: Understand the Facts”
#2The hn title could replace «Facts» with «FUD» since this is literally what this campaign is.
Re: ARM: “RISC-V Architecture: Understand the Facts”
#3The hn title could replace «Facts» with «FUD» since this is literally what this campaign is.
It is rather desperate. ARM could easily head off RISC-V by releasing a few low end cores under an open source license, but instead they're being disrupted. Rather classic case of the Innovator's Dilemma.
Re: ARM: “RISC-V Architecture: Understand the Facts”
#4Haha, that reads so much like Microsoft's FUD in the early 2000s targeting Linux ... so I guess we can conclude from that that ARM's assessment is that RISC-V is a viable alternative that's worth using and investing in?
Re: ARM: “RISC-V Architecture: Understand the Facts”
#5ARM is apparently and unsurprisingly scared shitless about the RISC-V threat.
Re: ARM: “RISC-V Architecture: Understand the Facts”
#6This page should be archived alongside the Halloween documents as a reminder of the endless FUD campaigns against FLOSS software/hardware.
Re: ARM: “RISC-V Architecture: Understand the Facts”
#7Are we sure this is published by Arm?
The whois and certificates seem a bit anonymous.
Re: ARM: “RISC-V Architecture: Understand the Facts”
#8The hn title could replace «Facts» with «FUD» since this is literally what this campaign is.
I'm a rather uninformed reader, and I would be interested to read about sources that say the facts presented here are wrong, rather than just read "it's a FUD campaign". At the end of the day, no camp rigoursly shared information
Re: ARM: “RISC-V Architecture: Understand the Facts”
#9Are we sure this is published by Arm? The whois and certificates seem a bit anonymous.
[deleted]
Re: ARM: “RISC-V Architecture: Understand the Facts”
#10I have to say that I’m surprised that it seems to be pretty factual.
The main points seem to be that RISC-V is not there yet and that customization is expensive. I guess for most projects you currently use ARM processors ARM will make most sense for a while. RISC-V will probably slowly eat a growing piece of that market though over the next years to decades.