Show HN: Maskmail – anonymous email address service
1–10 of 78 posts
Re: Show HN: Maskmail – anonymous email address service
#2Re: Show HN: Maskmail – anonymous email address service
#3But anyways, great idea! Wish you all the success or at least some decent side money.
Re: Show HN: Maskmail – anonymous email address service
#4Nice idea, but I suspect if it gets any traction, many services will just block maskmail addresses. That's why mailinator uses 100s of different domains and makes it really hard to get a list of all of them.
Re: Show HN: Maskmail – anonymous email address service
#5Re: Show HN: Maskmail – anonymous email address service
#6Re: Show HN: Maskmail – anonymous email address service
#7Once you start receiving spam to that address, you block it.
Re: Show HN: Maskmail – anonymous email address service
#8Why not just append a unique marker to your mail address? Some services support this. For gmail i believe you can use "+" as the separator: I.e. your email address is victim8384@gmail.com and you want to give your email address to a party called "spammer", you give them victim8384+spammer@gmail.com instead. Once you start receiving spam to that address, you block it.
Gmail also added . (dot) as a non-counted character, so you can put as many of those as you want into the user field, but most spam software is catching onto that too.
Re: Show HN: Maskmail – anonymous email address service
#9Why not just append a unique marker to your mail address? Some services support this. For gmail i believe you can use "+" as the separator: I.e. your email address is victim8384@gmail.com and you want to give your email address to a party called "spammer", you give them victim8384+spammer@gmail.com instead. Once you start receiving spam to that address, you block it.
Re: Show HN: Maskmail – anonymous email address service
#10Nice idea, but I suspect if it gets any traction, many services will just block maskmail addresses. That's why mailinator uses 100s of different domains and makes it really hard to get a list of all of them.
That's a good point. I'd let users pay for using their own domains.