How Killers Bought Guns They Weren't Supposed to Get
1–10 of 12 posts
Re: How Killers Bought Guns They Weren't Supposed to Get
#2Re: How Killers Bought Guns They Weren't Supposed to Get
#3How's this related to tech?
Re: How Killers Bought Guns They Weren't Supposed to Get
#4How's this related to tech?
Re: How Killers Bought Guns They Weren't Supposed to Get
#5Re: How Killers Bought Guns They Weren't Supposed to Get
#6How's this related to tech?
It is on a website? Hacker news isn't limited to technology discussions anyway. NFL, dating challenges, depression, politics, it's all here.
Re: How Killers Bought Guns They Weren't Supposed to Get
#7How's this related to tech?
Gun violence in America is a meaningful problem.
Re: How Killers Bought Guns They Weren't Supposed to Get
#8How long before we'll add an "Outline" link to use that decluttering service?
Re: How Killers Bought Guns They Weren't Supposed to Get
#9How's this related to tech?
There's a growing sense of a disconnect between "tech" (whatever we take that to mean) and, well, just about everyone else on some of these squishy ethical / legal matters like privacy, accessibility, "fair" taxation (whatever that means), etc.
In a less hand-wavy sense, you could also see this particular story as a failure of technology to account for fallible human systems with limited resources, or for the complexity of real-world legal / political contexts. This in turn leads into discussions of the flaws with government contract procurement processes, as well as meaningful discussions of the importance of a solid UI / UX design process.
Moreover, this article itself is an excellent working example of how to diagnose, drill down into, and present user-facing problems. If more of us who write software understood our users' problems this clearly, we'd build much better software.