Death of a Biohacker
nytimes.com
Death of a Biohacker
1–10 of 13 posts
Re: Death of a Biohacker
#2[deleted]
Re: Death of a Biohacker
#3Taking ketamine in a sensory deprivation tank really doesn't sound like a sensible idea to me.
Re: Death of a Biohacker
#4> She thought it likely that he had taken the drug, lost consciousness in the tank and drowned.
Why no autopsy?
Re: Death of a Biohacker
#5The article reads more like the death of a lying, scheming drug addict.
Re: Death of a Biohacker
#6Taking ketamine in a sensory deprivation tank really doesn't sound like a sensible idea to me.
You're probably aware of John C. Lilly, if not worth reading some of his work: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_C._Lilly#Exploration_of_h...
Re: Death of a Biohacker
#7The article reads more like the death of a lying, scheming drug addict.
Even if so, please don't post unsubstantive or ranty comments here.
Re: Death of a Biohacker
#8Taking ketamine in a sensory deprivation tank really doesn't sound like a sensible idea to me.
You're probably aware of John C. Lilly, if not worth reading some of his work: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_C._Lilly#Exploration_of_h...
I wasn't! So he's the guy that developed the sensory deprivation tank, and then started using them to take psychedelics in. Thanks for mentioning it, I never realised there was a link.
Re: Death of a Biohacker
#9The article reads more like the death of a lying, scheming drug addict.
Most of the few biohackers I've come across are mentally ill or otherwise reckless and dangerous. I hate being against open knowledge-building, but a world where real viruses are build, modified and transmitted in a similar way to computer viruses is a world I don't want to live in.
Re: Death of a Biohacker
#10[dead]