Libui: a portable GUI library for C
github.com
Libui: a portable GUI library for C
1–10 of 164 posts
Re: Libui: a portable GUI library for C
#2Re: Libui: a portable GUI library for C
#3So OK maybe I can get some insight reading the code. The "common" folder seems a good place to start[2]. Um, no. Short, generic uninformative filenames ("matrix.c", "control.c") and very few introductory comments. The opposite of "literate programming".
Re: Libui: a portable GUI library for C
#4I might be interested, esp. since it claims Python bindings, but documentation appears to be nil. Seriously, nonexistent. A GUI lib surely has an API complex enough to require _some_ kind of reference docs, at least. But the contents of the doc folder[1] are just a joke, most of the files contain single lines, and the .md files are fragments with many "TODO" notes. So OK maybe I can get some insight reading the code.…
Re: Libui: a portable GUI library for C
#5I might be interested, esp. since it claims Python bindings, but documentation appears to be nil. Seriously, nonexistent. A GUI lib surely has an API complex enough to require _some_ kind of reference docs, at least. But the contents of the doc folder[1] are just a joke, most of the files contain single lines, and the .md files are fragments with many "TODO" notes. So OK maybe I can get some insight reading the code.…
Re: Libui: a portable GUI library for C
#6Re: Libui: a portable GUI library for C
#7What a surprise, so there are alternatives to Electron garbage! Who knew!
Re: Libui: a portable GUI library for C
#8What a surprise, so there are alternatives to Electron garbage! Who knew!
Qt? Although it has its own problems, the end product is often way better than Electron.
Re: Libui: a portable GUI library for C
#9Re: Libui: a portable GUI library for C
#10I might be interested, esp. since it claims Python bindings, but documentation appears to be nil. Seriously, nonexistent. A GUI lib surely has an API complex enough to require _some_ kind of reference docs, at least. But the contents of the doc folder[1] are just a joke, most of the files contain single lines, and the .md files are fragments with many "TODO" notes. So OK maybe I can get some insight reading the code.…
Your hostility toward an MIT licensed project is what is ruining the open-contribution model of developing software. In 2005, it was "Hey, this looks great, want me to write up a documentation?" Now it's "Not up to my standards, it's a joke." Absolutely disgusting behavior that is becoming gradually more common.