Private Ubuntu Cloud
ubuntu.com
Private Ubuntu Cloud
1–10 of 26 posts
Re: Private Ubuntu Cloud
#2The web-site doesn't appear to provide a potential customer with the information they need to evaluate the service. At least, not easily.
Re: Private Ubuntu Cloud
#3Perhaps it's just me, but how do you price this service? Or is it free? The web-site doesn't appear to provide a potential customer with the information they need to evaluate the service. At least, not easily.
The problem is, that you need to rent/buy the maximum hardware size of your could upfront as amazon does it. Therefore it's a bigh myth you only pay what you use because the provider has to split all costs+interests among the customers (like EC2). Including costs of hardware/infrastructure not currently in use!
If you have your own rack(s), tools like eucalyptus/ubuntu cloud can help you to dynamically scale your apps and use your hardware more efficent.
But remember: To do this it needs more than some instant-on virtual machines: You need to be able to automatically spawn applications with tools like puppet or chef, too. This usually requires some amount of work and brain :-)
Claiming to be able to scale to infinity just because you're using EC2/Eucalyptus/OpenStack is a biiiiiig common lie.
Re: Private Ubuntu Cloud
#4Re: Private Ubuntu Cloud
#5I'm sorry but the whole concept of a private cloud makes no sense to me - why would you have a private electricity generator for your home? The security issues are a lot of fear, uncertainty and doubt (FUD), I have written about it here: http://rakkhi.blogspot.com/2010/07/cloud-computing-security-...
Re: Private Ubuntu Cloud
#6Re: Private Ubuntu Cloud
#7I'm sorry but the whole concept of a private cloud makes no sense to me - why would you have a private electricity generator for your home? The security issues are a lot of fear, uncertainty and doubt (FUD), I have written about it here: http://rakkhi.blogspot.com/2010/07/cloud-computing-security-...
the obvious: not every network is or can be connected to the internet, often for security reasons.
Re: Private Ubuntu Cloud
#8I'm sorry but the whole concept of a private cloud makes no sense to me - why would you have a private electricity generator for your home? The security issues are a lot of fear, uncertainty and doubt (FUD), I have written about it here: http://rakkhi.blogspot.com/2010/07/cloud-computing-security-...
Your private electricity example is probably a good example. Most datacenters and companies that rely on power pull it from multiple grids and actually do have a way to generate their own private power. The same will probably hold true for IaaS at some point. It will be something people grow to trust but if you want that last 0.1% you are going to have to do it yourself.
Re: Private Ubuntu Cloud
#9I'm sorry but the whole concept of a private cloud makes no sense to me - why would you have a private electricity generator for your home? The security issues are a lot of fear, uncertainty and doubt (FUD), I have written about it here: http://rakkhi.blogspot.com/2010/07/cloud-computing-security-...
For instance that is part of the french navy policy (separate networks). You find it funny, until it saves your ass :)
Sidepoint: weither you believe it's FUD or not, it's a matter of fact that there is a real market here. A lot of medium to large companies are actually totally reluctant to put anything in the cloud. That's part of why you see github:fi, or the hoptoad firewalled version, or the ubuntu private cloud offer.
Another sidepoint: working with vaguely sensitive data at home on an encrypted disk is OK for me, but putting it into an EC2 instance: I would get fired and/or sued (not FUD here, I've been warned!).
Re: Private Ubuntu Cloud
#10I'm sorry but the whole concept of a private cloud makes no sense to me - why would you have a private electricity generator for your home? The security issues are a lot of fear, uncertainty and doubt (FUD), I have written about it here: http://rakkhi.blogspot.com/2010/07/cloud-computing-security-...
Perhaps ironically, a white-listed firewall rule for a cluster of EC2 instances is probably more secure than most government networks, but putting it anywhere that compromises physical security is just as bad.