A history of the Amiga
arstechnica.com
A history of the Amiga
1–10 of 27 posts
Re: A history of the Amiga
#2Re: A history of the Amiga
#3Re: A history of the Amiga
#4Even my beloved Commodore 64 is long gone, but I haven't been able to part with the Amiga. Not saying this is a good thing. Just saying.
Re: A history of the Amiga
#5Re: A history of the Amiga
#6Re: A history of the Amiga
#7I still have things like this, floating around in my brain somewhere[]:
.loop: move.w $dff006,$dff180
btst.b #6,$bfe001
bne.s .loop
It was so awesome, a computer with a great CPU, intriguing and poweful custom hardware for graphics/sound, and still a very decent operating system on top. It had it all. Sniff.[] Somewhere slightly shady, since I mis-remembered the two first register addresses, and also the sign of the /FE0 bit being read by the third instruction. Still, it's been 14 years since I switched to Linux, so I'm kind of happy.
Re: A history of the Amiga
#8Having to choose between a Core i3, i5, Athlon, Duron, Sempron, Whateveron, or between embedded, ATI or Nvidia doesn`t really feel like having any choice...
Or, to paraphrase Henry Ford, you can choose any architecture, as long as it runs Windows.
Re: A history of the Amiga
#9Re: A history of the Amiga
#10(More of my school friends back then had Ataris than Amigas, so it was a no-brainer decision for me.)
I'm curious what spurred the insane die-hard mentality though. Most of us left the Amigas and Ataris for the PC in the early 90s, except for a few who swore by their Amigas and loved them to bits even though their relative performance grew more and more pathetic.
So what caused it? First love? Or was there something genuinely good about the system? I'm genuinely curious.