Live data from Hacker News

TDLib – Build Your Own Telegram Client

telegram.org

1–10 of 101 posts

Re: TDLib – Build Your Own Telegram Client

#2
> P.S. Today, we're also introducing Telegram X for Android, a new official app.

What is wrong with the current app? Or was that not official? I find it better than the Facebook Messenger (light or not) and it's definitely much better than the Hangouts app from Google.

Re: TDLib – Build Your Own Telegram Client

#6
post #2

> P.S. Today, we're also introducing Telegram X for Android, a new official app. What is wrong with the current app? Or was that not official? I find it better than the Facebook Messenger (light or not) and it's definitely much better than the Hangouts app from Google.

In the linked article in the quote it sounds like it's basically the same concept as Firefox Nightly. New and experimental features that may or may not make it into the other app. It's not meant to replace the old app right now, but it might do so in the future.

Re: TDLib – Build Your Own Telegram Client

#7
post #2

> P.S. Today, we're also introducing Telegram X for Android, a new official app. What is wrong with the current app? Or was that not official? I find it better than the Facebook Messenger (light or not) and it's definitely much better than the Hangouts app from Google.

As they state that's because of lack of innovations among competitors. So they now compete internally.

Re: TDLib – Build Your Own Telegram Client

#9
post #2

> P.S. Today, we're also introducing Telegram X for Android, a new official app. What is wrong with the current app? Or was that not official? I find it better than the Facebook Messenger (light or not) and it's definitely much better than the Hangouts app from Google.

They have had two apps (Telegram vs Telegram Desktop) on macOS too for a while. IIRC one is Electron-ish-based and the other is native Cocoa. The first one got features slightly faster but lacked Secret Chats IIRC.

Re: TDLib – Build Your Own Telegram Client

#10
post #8

Telegram has a poor security record, with homegrown encryption algorithms and no end to end encryption by default.

While I am wary of "build-your-own-crypto", saying it has a poor security record is, to my knowledge so far, incorrect. I have yet to see satisfactory cryptanalysis that shows a weakness (theoretical or real) in the protocol. If anything, it seems to withstand scrutiny so far. Even the dedicated security.se.com question[0] seems like it wraps itself in tautologies.

Until then, throwing the "homegrown encryption" argument to argue for Telegram's weakness is hand-waving and a straw man.

Telegram's security is sufficient for the threat model I have to face against now and in the future.

[0]: https://security.stackexchange.com/questions/49782/is-telegr...

Post reply on HN