Feature comparison of ack, ag, git-grep, GNU grep and ripgrep
1–10 of 101 posts
Re: Feature comparison of ack, ag, git-grep, GNU grep and ripgrep
#2Thank you, have been trying to motivate myself to switch to ack/ag for a while. This seems like it might be what I needed.
Re: Feature comparison of ack, ag, git-grep, GNU grep and ripgrep
#3https://github.com/ggreer/the_silver_searcher/issues/385
its been over 4 years... its had its chance.
Re: Feature comparison of ack, ag, git-grep, GNU grep and ripgrep
#4as a long time user of `find . -name "*.foo" -exec grep -Hin {} \;` moving to ack has been great! I love the syntax and the speed and the fact that it actually respects your ignore files. ripgrep is great too. ag on the other hand is recommended by everyone but doesn't seem to respect ignores or understand modern ignore syntax. give it a pass. https://github.com/ggreer/the_silver_searcher/issues/385 its been over 4 y…
Re: Feature comparison of ack, ag, git-grep, GNU grep and ripgrep
#5Re: Feature comparison of ack, ag, git-grep, GNU grep and ripgrep
#6Not exactly sure what it is, but I really like this presentation format. Thank you, have been trying to motivate myself to switch to ack/ag for a while. This seems like it might be what I needed.
As for search, I'm on Windows and I like to use FileLocator Pro.
Re: Feature comparison of ack, ag, git-grep, GNU grep and ripgrep
#7Re: Feature comparison of ack, ag, git-grep, GNU grep and ripgrep
#8Re: Feature comparison of ack, ag, git-grep, GNU grep and ripgrep
#9Most annoying thing is that $ does not work with windows newlines.
Re: Feature comparison of ack, ag, git-grep, GNU grep and ripgrep
#10switched from ag to rg a few months ago and have nothing but good things to say about the experience.