Net Neutrality already attacked in Portugal
1–10 of 72 posts
Re: Net Neutrality already attacked in Portugal
#2Re: Net Neutrality already attacked in Portugal
#3Even if you bought every package possible, it's still cheaper than most packages here. You're not really helping your case here buddy.
Re: Net Neutrality already attacked in Portugal
#4Even if you bought every package possible, it's still cheaper than most packages here. You're not really helping your case here buddy.
It's not a matter of (absolute) pricing, but of (relative) preference. It's giving established players a significant advantage that puts independent actors in a weakened position.
Personally, I wish Comcast (being the only high-speed option for much of the US) followed this model for TV, where I only want 2 channels but can't pay for less than 80 or so.
Re: Net Neutrality already attacked in Portugal
#5Even if you bought every package possible, it's still cheaper than most packages here. You're not really helping your case here buddy.
Re: Net Neutrality already attacked in Portugal
#6Re: Net Neutrality already attacked in Portugal
#7Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's not a matter of (absolute) pricing, but of (relative) preference. It's giving established players a significant advantage that puts independent actors in a weakened position.
So is there no network access at all other than these apps? I don't see that clarified on the page. Personally, I wish Comcast (being the only high-speed option for much of the US) followed this model for TV, where I only want 2 channels but can't pay for less than 80 or so.
Re: Net Neutrality already attacked in Portugal
#8Even if you bought every package possible, it's still cheaper than most packages here. You're not really helping your case here buddy.
Re: Net Neutrality already attacked in Portugal
#9Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's not a matter of (absolute) pricing, but of (relative) preference. It's giving established players a significant advantage that puts independent actors in a weakened position.
So is there no network access at all other than these apps? I don't see that clarified on the page. Personally, I wish Comcast (being the only high-speed option for much of the US) followed this model for TV, where I only want 2 channels but can't pay for less than 80 or so.
Re: Net Neutrality already attacked in Portugal
#10https://stratechery.com/2017/pro-neutrality-anti-title-ii/
There are the Euros and Portuguese you would expect, but in this case perhaps it was the language difference that introduced its own issues: Congressman Khanna seems to have missed the text at the top (under ‘+ Smart Net’) that clearly stated that the packages were for an additional 10GB/month of data; in addition to what, you may ask? Simply scroll down the page:
So to recount: one Portugal story is made up, and the other declared that a 10GB family plan with an extra 10GB for a collection of apps of your choosing for €25/month ($30/month) is a future to be feared; given that AT&T charges $65 for a single “Unlimited” plan that downscales video, bans tethering, and slows speeds after 22GB, one wonders if most Americans share that fear.