Are we in a cryptocurrency bubble? A comparison with the 2000 dotcom bubble
1–10 of 15 posts
Re: Are we in a cryptocurrency bubble? A comparison with the 2000 dotcom bubble
#2 Conclusion: It’s obviously a simplified model and you can play around with the numbers and get marginally different results, but the key insight is that even if you’re a fervent crypto believer, if you think there is a nonzero chance a crash might happen then in order to maximize your EV (i.e. make the most money) you should keep some % of your money on the sidelines to invest once the bubble pops and lower your average buy-in cost. The higher the probability you assign to a crash, the more money you should keep on the sidelines and vice versaRe: Are we in a cryptocurrency bubble? A comparison with the 2000 dotcom bubble
#3Re: Are we in a cryptocurrency bubble? A comparison with the 2000 dotcom bubble
#4Re: Are we in a cryptocurrency bubble? A comparison with the 2000 dotcom bubble
#5Re: Are we in a cryptocurrency bubble? A comparison with the 2000 dotcom bubble
#6The speculation about cryptocurrency valuations is a great example of how bad people are at dealing with radical novelties. People spout meaningless analogies, be they about decades old market crashes or centuries old speculative frenzies like tulip bulbs, as if they apply here when clearly they cannot.
Is there any example from history you think could be used as an analogy or do you think there's no way of comparing this to anything that's happened before? If so, how do you think about cryptocurrency valuation?
Re: Are we in a cryptocurrency bubble? A comparison with the 2000 dotcom bubble
#7The speculation about cryptocurrency valuations is a great example of how bad people are at dealing with radical novelties. People spout meaningless analogies, be they about decades old market crashes or centuries old speculative frenzies like tulip bulbs, as if they apply here when clearly they cannot.
Re: Are we in a cryptocurrency bubble? A comparison with the 2000 dotcom bubble
#8Bitcoin chart is a fractal. Every single time in the history of it there is a post about it being a bubble. $100, $1000, $3K, $4K, $10K, I keep seeing this for yyyyears.
If it doesn't happen before $100K I'd be truly astonished. The longer this goes on, the higher it goes, the harder and faster it will crash. A lot of people are going to be caught holding nothing.
Re: Are we in a cryptocurrency bubble? A comparison with the 2000 dotcom bubble
#9The speculation about cryptocurrency valuations is a great example of how bad people are at dealing with radical novelties. People spout meaningless analogies, be they about decades old market crashes or centuries old speculative frenzies like tulip bulbs, as if they apply here when clearly they cannot.
Appreciate the feedback! Is there any example from history you think could be used as an analogy or do you think there's no way of comparing this to anything that's happened before? If so, how do you think about cryptocurrency valuation?
When Bitcoin implodes the value of your Bitcoin collectable merchandise will vastly exceed the value of your BTC. Those physical coins will slowly increase over time as their obscurity and notoriety grows.
Re: Are we in a cryptocurrency bubble? A comparison with the 2000 dotcom bubble
#10Earlier quoted context omitted.
Appreciate the feedback! Is there any example from history you think could be used as an analogy or do you think there's no way of comparing this to anything that's happened before? If so, how do you think about cryptocurrency valuation?
This is the first time we've had a bubble around an asset with zero intrinsic value. Even tulips, or "worthless" Weimar Republic bills had negligible value. When Bitcoin implodes the value of your Bitcoin collectable merchandise will vastly exceed the value of your BTC. Those physical coins will slowly increase over time as their obscurity and notoriety grows.
Bitcoin has many uses, but for the sake of argument let's take its often stated use of acting as digital gold. If gold is "intrinsically valuable" which I presume you think it is, then so is bitcoin. Gold is valuable because it is a good store of value due to its properties of being scarce, long-lasting, easily divisible, transportable, etc. Bitcoin is all these things too and in fact is a much better store of value than gold. I see no reason, other than "brand", why gold should be "intrinsically valuable" but bitcoin not. Btw, gold is a 3-6trillion dollar market depending on how you do the accounting (https://schiffgold.com/commentaries/just-how-big-is-the-gold...).