Live data from Hacker News

Antibody Kills 91% of HIV Strains

online.wsj.com

1–10 of 54 posts

Re: Antibody Kills 91% of HIV Strains

#8

What happens if we manage to kill 91% of the HIV strains? Won't the remaining 9% of the strains continue to spread and mutate? Then we're back to square one.

Likewise, 91% of the strains is not necessarily the same as 91% of the people currently living with HIV. Can anyone provide details on what, exactly, this finding does? Do we need to kill 100% of the HIV strains to have a cure? Is there one strain that is the "dangerous" one, and it isn't covered in the 91% number? Will the virus simply mutate new strains?

Re: Antibody Kills 91% of HIV Strains

#9

What happens if we manage to kill 91% of the HIV strains? Won't the remaining 9% of the strains continue to spread and mutate? Then we're back to square one.

There's rarely an antibody that kills every possible strain of a disease, illustrated by the fact that there is not an antibody that kills every disease. 91% of HIV strains means we are 91% of the way to complete eradication.

Plus, one of the big problems thus far have been we had NO IDEA how to attack the HIV bodies. Perhaps developing an understanding of this antibody will allow us to gain new understanding, and perhaps in good 'ol engineering tradition we will be able to change this, that, recompile, and cover a few more %. I know it's not that easy, but if you've ever developed code or hardware, having pre-existing, working models makes everything miles and miles easier.

Re: Antibody Kills 91% of HIV Strains

#10

What happens if we manage to kill 91% of the HIV strains? Won't the remaining 9% of the strains continue to spread and mutate? Then we're back to square one.

It can, however, make the population of people who have HIV much smaller and slow the spread of it down dramatically.
Post reply on HN