Live data from Hacker News

Google Employee's Anti-Diversity Manifesto Goes 'Internally Viral'

motherboard.vice.com

1–10 of 172 posts

Re: Google Employee's Anti-Diversity Manifesto Goes 'Internally Viral'

#2
I'm confused. There is no quotes, excerpts of said document.

The only hint we have is that;

- women choose to work with people, men with things

Or something like that.

However that is a psycho sociological FACT and studies show this to be true.

The diversity programs are ridiculous.

How come there are no diversity programs in the military, coal mines, and other jobs demanding hard labour and shitty working conditions?

Apparently we want a 50% male - female split in the cushy office programming jobs, but not coal mines where 99.8% of employees are men.

Why are employees wasting time at work gossiping about some other employee's power point slides/PDF? Don't they have work to do?

We're not talking about crimes against humanity here, just a person's politically incorrect writings that seem slightly offensive.

Thank God I don't work with the losers at Mother Google

Re: Google Employee's Anti-Diversity Manifesto Goes 'Internally Viral'

#4
I'd really like to see this document as a whole before judging.

By the way, I think that being really open means listening to opinions without "rage quitting" for holding an unpopular opinion, or calling him a "racist" or "white male supremacy supporter", which is a way to turn down an argument whatever its merit is.

Is the document's author a jerk? Let's explain that to him, and maybe shame him on a data-driven basis.

Has the author some valid point, but went too far with speculations? Maybe he/she doesn't deserve all this uproar.

Re: Google Employee's Anti-Diversity Manifesto Goes 'Internally Viral'

#5
> replacing Google's diversity initiatives with policies that encourage "ideological diversity"

I somehow think that if one aims for "ideological diversity" then "gender/race/minority diversity" will come for free.

But the question is how to you target "ideological diversity" when hiring.

Re: Google Employee's Anti-Diversity Manifesto Goes 'Internally Viral'

#7
> "I feel like there's a lot of pushback from white dudes who genuinely feel like diversity is lowering the bar,"

Well, it is, if they'd hire based on ability it'd mainly be a bunch of Asian and White males working there.

Asians, especially Asian males, don't rank high enough on the average leftist's imaginary oppression scale to count as "diversity" - "diversity" being mostly code for "not White", "not male" and sometimes also "not Asian or Jewish".

Re: Google Employee's Anti-Diversity Manifesto Goes 'Internally Viral'

#8

I'd really like to see this document as a whole before judging. By the way, I think that being really open means listening to opinions without "rage quitting" for holding an unpopular opinion, or calling him a "racist" or "white male supremacy supporter", which is a way to turn down an argument whatever its merit is. Is the document's author a jerk? Let's explain that to him, and maybe shame him on a data-driven basi…

At the same time, if the data supported his claims, I wonder what Googlers would have to say. If Google wants the best, what is it willing to risk?

Personally I think for most companies you're better off with a diverse crowd regardless, lest you end up with a bunch of out of touch yuppie guys trying to "change the world" by building an IOT coffee machine. That is to say, all types of diversity be it race, socioeconomic status, gender, etc. will inevitably contribute to your company's collective wisdom, which is probably generally has a larger impact than ensuring everyone you hire has all the sorting algorithms memorized.

Post reply on HN