Real people don't need end-to-end encryption says UK Home Secretary

And I thought the BBC article was bad enough. This is just appalling.

"Real people" just use ROT13...

Real people keep their heads down, don't question authority, and don't cause trouble.

> Companies are constantly making trade-offs between security and 'usability', and it is here where our experts believe opportunities may lie.

Amber Rudd's "experts" couldn't prevent a simple brute force attack on her own parliament that would have easily been mitigated with 2FA (https://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/06/26/parliament_email_ha...)

I don't think her statement actually says "real people don't need end-to-end encryption". I'm not sure what she is saying though. Not banning end-to-end encryption, not asking for back doors, but having "mature conversations" that have something to do with trade-offs between usability and security. What?