Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Petition to open source Flash

github.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

1–10 of 255 posts

Re: Petition to open source Flash

#5

Post by mtgx »

Isn't Flash player's code super-messy by now? (a hint towards that could be all the vulnerabilities found for it every week). Open sourcing it would have to dramatically improve the code quality and in a relatively short period of time (2 years max), otherwise browser vendors would never go along with it (nor should they).

Sounds like a daunting task, especially if no big organization/leader takes up the task of cleaning it up, the way OpenBSD did with LibreSSL.

Re: Petition to open source Flash

#7

Post by nkkollaw »

tbodt wrote: post #4
nkkollaw wrote: post #2

Why not contribute to well-established open source Flash players? http://lightspark.github.io/ https://www.gnu.org/software/gnash/

An open source Flash player is not perfectly bug-for-bug compatible with the real Flash player.

Sure, but if anyone is really interested in Flash and Adobe's player is reaching EOL, whatever open source project gets to be used as its substitute will become the standard, and no one will care about compatibility with Adobe's Flash player, since no one will have it installed.

Re: Petition to open source Flash

#8

Post by tbodt »

mtgx wrote: post #5

Isn't Flash player's code super-messy by now? (a hint towards that could be all the vulnerabilities found for it every week). Open sourcing it would have to dramatically improve the code quality and in a relatively short period of time (2 years max), otherwise browser vendors would never go along with it (nor should they). Sounds like a daunting task, especially if no big organization/leader takes up the task of clea…

Flash doesn't have to be shipped with browsers. You could always install it manually.

Re: Petition to open source Flash

#9

Post by tbodt »

nkkollaw wrote: post #7
tbodt wrote: post #4

Earlier quoted context omitted.

An open source Flash player is not perfectly bug-for-bug compatible with the real Flash player.

Sure, but if anyone is really interested in Flash and Adobe's player is reaching EOL, whatever open source project gets to be used as its substitute will become the standard, and no one will care about compatibility with Adobe's Flash player, since no one will have it installed.

Which one is everyone going to install: an open source flash player that's not quite compatible, or the adobe one that's perfectly compatible?
Post reply on HN