Chinese scientists test quantum entanglement over unprecedented distance
scientificamerican.com
Chinese scientists test quantum entanglement over unprecedented distance
1–10 of 80 posts
Re: Chinese scientists test quantum entanglement over unprecedented distance
#2Why is sending photons over distances a verification of quantum entanglement?
Can someone elaborate on what this is?
Re: Chinese scientists test quantum entanglement over unprecedented distance
#3Re: Chinese scientists test quantum entanglement over unprecedented distance
#4Re: Chinese scientists test quantum entanglement over unprecedented distance
#5I thought quantum entanglement is the idea that two quantum particles separated by distance will behave the same at the same time regardless od distance. Why is sending photons over distances a verification of quantum entanglement? Can someone elaborate on what this is?
http://www.cbc.ca/beta/news/canada/calgary/calgary-teleporta...
Information can't travel faster than the speed of light. You have to actually take the photons and move them away from one another, then check one which will modify both.
Re: Chinese scientists test quantum entanglement over unprecedented distance
#6By my understanding that's impossible, although I always wondered if you could coordinate FTL, by detecting when a particle was no longer entangled.
Can someone with the background comment?
Re: Chinese scientists test quantum entanglement over unprecedented distance
#7I thought quantum entanglement is the idea that two quantum particles separated by distance will behave the same at the same time regardless od distance. Why is sending photons over distances a verification of quantum entanglement? Can someone elaborate on what this is?
I'm not a physicist, but I'm sure there're be one on HN that will tell us what this study really means.
Re: Chinese scientists test quantum entanglement over unprecedented distance
#8"If Bohmian Mechanics as an non-local hidden variables interpretation of quantum mechanics is accurate it should allow quantum computers to implement a search of an N-item database at most in O ( N 3 ) {\displaystyle O({\sqrt[{3}]{N}})} steps. This is slightly faster than the O ( N ) O({\sqrt {N}}) steps taken by Grover's algorithm using standard interpretations of quantum mechanics. Neither search method will allow quantum computers to solve NP-Complete problems in polynomial time.[4]"
I thought there was no way to figure out which interpretation of QM is correct. Can someone explain?
Re: Chinese scientists test quantum entanglement over unprecedented distance
#9I thought quantum entanglement is the idea that two quantum particles separated by distance will behave the same at the same time regardless od distance. Why is sending photons over distances a verification of quantum entanglement? Can someone elaborate on what this is?
I too am wondering about this. I thought entanglement couldn't be used for communication because observing both particles simultaneously will reveal that they have opposite spins. It's a conformation after observation, based on what the quantum superposition collapses into once you observe the state. But the actual state is also unknown until you observe it. I'm not a physicist, but I'm sure there're be one on HN tha…
Re: Chinese scientists test quantum entanglement over unprecedented distance
#10A staple of sci-fi has been a pair of boxes with quantum entangled particles inside allowing FTL communications once the boxes travel (sub-FTL) to their destination. By my understanding that's impossible, although I always wondered if you could coordinate FTL, by detecting when a particle was no longer entangled. Can someone with the background comment?