What I learned today about SNCF and California HSR (2012)
marketurbanism.com
What I learned today about SNCF and California HSR (2012)
1–10 of 39 posts
Re: What I learned today about SNCF and California HSR (2012)
#2For example, the BART runs a branch line to Dublin/Pleasanton (and possibly Livermore) but it's not part of the "trunk" to Richmond.
Re: What I learned today about SNCF and California HSR (2012)
#3How do European countries deal with it? It's not like Germany and France don't have rural areas versus urban areas (vast swaths of both countries are farmland).
Re: What I learned today about SNCF and California HSR (2012)
#4This is a classical example of American "worst of both worlds" governance. People in Bakersfield aren't going to take the HSR to LA, at least not in enough numbers to justify connecting Bakersfield to the HSR. It'd be better to just build a straight-shot HSR and take all the money you save and give a tax break to folks in Bakersfield, or something . But our political system isn't able to achieve that result. How do E…
Re: What I learned today about SNCF and California HSR (2012)
#5This is a classical example of American "worst of both worlds" governance. People in Bakersfield aren't going to take the HSR to LA, at least not in enough numbers to justify connecting Bakersfield to the HSR. It'd be better to just build a straight-shot HSR and take all the money you save and give a tax break to folks in Bakersfield, or something . But our political system isn't able to achieve that result. How do E…
But not connecting a city of almost 400,000 people is odd, it should get a stop. I don't think the Deutsche Bahn oder SCNF would be allowed not connecting those cities in their home markets.
Re: What I learned today about SNCF and California HSR (2012)
#6Re: What I learned today about SNCF and California HSR (2012)
#7Does anyone know why using spurs (branch lines) is a bad thing? For example, the BART runs a branch line to Dublin/Pleasanton (and possibly Livermore) but it's not part of the "trunk" to Richmond.
It is always a trade-off, you'll never get the perfect route.
Re: What I learned today about SNCF and California HSR (2012)
#8This is a classical example of American "worst of both worlds" governance. People in Bakersfield aren't going to take the HSR to LA, at least not in enough numbers to justify connecting Bakersfield to the HSR. It'd be better to just build a straight-shot HSR and take all the money you save and give a tax break to folks in Bakersfield, or something . But our political system isn't able to achieve that result. How do E…
In Germany the ICE train mostly runs on existing routes, for newly build routes you have to make the trade off between connecting cities and travel time. But not connecting a city of almost 400,000 people is odd, it should get a stop. I don't think the Deutsche Bahn oder SCNF would be allowed not connecting those cities in their home markets.
That doesn't mean they wouldn't grow to like it eventually, but it wont help ridership in its early and fragile years.
Re: What I learned today about SNCF and California HSR (2012)
#9Re: What I learned today about SNCF and California HSR (2012)
#10This is a classical example of American "worst of both worlds" governance. People in Bakersfield aren't going to take the HSR to LA, at least not in enough numbers to justify connecting Bakersfield to the HSR. It'd be better to just build a straight-shot HSR and take all the money you save and give a tax break to folks in Bakersfield, or something . But our political system isn't able to achieve that result. How do E…