Live data from Hacker News

Why are the east of cities usually poorer?

thejanuarist.com

1–10 of 101 posts

Re: Why are the east of cities usually poorer?

#4
post #3

In Australia, where the prevailing winds are also westerlies, the opposite is true. i.e. the east of most cities is more prestigious than the west.

Out of interest, is that typical on both coasts? Just wondering if the river direction has anything to do with it.

Re: Why are the east of cities usually poorer?

#8
post #4
post #3

In Australia, where the prevailing winds are also westerlies, the opposite is true. i.e. the east of most cities is more prestigious than the west.

Out of interest, is that typical on both coasts? Just wondering if the river direction has anything to do with it.

I don't know about Perth, but it's definitely true in Sydney (Ocean on the east) and Melbourne (Ocean on the south).

Re: Why are the east of cities usually poorer?

#9
post #6

counterexample: Louisvile, KY

Maybe because the city underwent a massive transition post Industrial Revolution? "In late January and February 1937, 19 inches (48 cm) of rain fell during a month of heavy rain. It caused the "Great Flood of '37".[23][24] The flood submerged about 70% of the city, caused the loss of power, and forced the evacuation of 175,000 residents. It led to dramatic changes in where residents lived." (from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louisville,_Kentucky)
Post reply on HN