Climate Impacts of Biking vs. Driving
keith.seas.harvard.edu
Climate Impacts of Biking vs. Driving
1–10 of 55 posts
Re: Climate Impacts of Biking vs. Driving
#2Re: Climate Impacts of Biking vs. Driving
#3Re: Climate Impacts of Biking vs. Driving
#4Can't I just bike to school and feel good about it? Is nothing sacred?
Re: Climate Impacts of Biking vs. Driving
#5Can't I just bike to school and feel good about it? Is nothing sacred?
Re: Climate Impacts of Biking vs. Driving
#6It doesn't count what the impact of extracting gasoline is, or the effect of transporting it on a supertanker. And what about feeding all those people working in the oil industry? and the energy used by lobbyists to convince people to drill in Alaska. And aren't they eating meat themselves? And the BP leak? How much km of cycling did that cost? This kind of study is completely bogus.
Plus, did I miss something, or was food not counted as a renewable resource? While agriculture is not carbon neutral, it's also not a 100% carbon source.
Re: Climate Impacts of Biking vs. Driving
#7Re: Climate Impacts of Biking vs. Driving
#8It is better to start with the most avoidable emissions first. Driving is obviously more avoidable than respiration, and coal fired electricity generation is likely even more avoidable. After that the next step will be to reduce the CO2 footprint of food production as well as changing to a diet with lower CO2 footprint.
Comparisons like the one in the article only give the message that it is really nothing you can effectively do about climate change, so why not continue as usual.
Re: Climate Impacts of Biking vs. Driving
#9Can't I just bike to school and feel good about it? Is nothing sacred?
Re: Climate Impacts of Biking vs. Driving
#10Without denigrating the need for bike safety and separated lanes, I really wonder about the numbers on the carbon trade-off there!