Live data from Hacker News

GRVI Phalanx joins The Kilocore Club

fpga.org

1–10 of 23 posts

Re: GRVI Phalanx joins The Kilocore Club

#5
post #4
post #2

If I'm not mistaken, the devices go for 5-6k for the eval kit?

Yep. The Arty board (which ran 32 cores) is $99, though, which is actually a lot more interesting. http://store.digilentinc.com/arty-artix-7-fpga-development-b...

Is it better than the Zynq platform ? Parallella still sells SBC with a dual core arm + fpga for 100$ IIRC

Re: GRVI Phalanx joins The Kilocore Club

#8
post #4

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yep. The Arty board (which ran 32 cores) is $99, though, which is actually a lot more interesting. http://store.digilentinc.com/arty-artix-7-fpga-development-b...

Is it better than the Zynq platform ? Parallella still sells SBC with a dual core arm + fpga for 100$ IIRC

Better for FPGA development. The FPGA on the Arty is slightly larger (28K -> 33K logic cells), and all peripherals, including memory, are connected directly to the FPGA instead of through the ARM SoC.

Also, the I/O headers are omitted from the $99 Parallela board, so it's difficult to program. (No JTAG connector.)

Re: GRVI Phalanx joins The Kilocore Club

#10
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Is it better than the Zynq platform ? Parallella still sells SBC with a dual core arm + fpga for 100$ IIRC

Better for FPGA development. The FPGA on the Arty is slightly larger (28K -> 33K logic cells), and all peripherals, including memory, are connected directly to the FPGA instead of through the ARM SoC. Also, the I/O headers are omitted from the $99 Parallela board, so it's difficult to program. (No JTAG connector.)

does it means that it is possible to done the 1680 cores thing on the Arty board? if can't, what made the Xilinx board more suitable to implement the 1680-cores on it ?
Post reply on HN