Docker and Canonical Partner on Commercially-Supported Docker Engine for Ubuntu
1–10 of 80 posts
Re: Docker and Canonical Partner on Commercially-Supported Docker Engine for Ubuntu
#2This makes me feel good about going with CentOS for Docker. Red Hat has a custom, stable Docker version which is rock-solid (albeit somewhat old, 1.10).
Re: Docker and Canonical Partner on Commercially-Supported Docker Engine for Ubuntu
#3This makes me feel good about going with CentOS for Docker. Red Hat has a custom, stable Docker version which is rock-solid (albeit somewhat old, 1.10).
Somewhat old? That's basically ancient.
Re: Docker and Canonical Partner on Commercially-Supported Docker Engine for Ubuntu
#4This makes me feel good about going with CentOS for Docker. Red Hat has a custom, stable Docker version which is rock-solid (albeit somewhat old, 1.10).
Depending on your use case, that may not be such a great idea. Unless Red Hat have back-ported it, 1.10 misses several important security advances that have come into Docker in recent versions...
Re: Docker and Canonical Partner on Commercially-Supported Docker Engine for Ubuntu
#5This makes me feel good about going with CentOS for Docker. Red Hat has a custom, stable Docker version which is rock-solid (albeit somewhat old, 1.10).
docker - rock-solid - v1.10 there is something odd in that sentence.
Re: Docker and Canonical Partner on Commercially-Supported Docker Engine for Ubuntu
#6Did I read that correctly? This will be delivered as a snap package?
Re: Docker and Canonical Partner on Commercially-Supported Docker Engine for Ubuntu
#7This makes me feel good about going with CentOS for Docker. Red Hat has a custom, stable Docker version which is rock-solid (albeit somewhat old, 1.10).
Technically runc and the Kernel are setting up/providing your containers. Docker Engine is a platform for managing containers/images.
Re: Docker and Canonical Partner on Commercially-Supported Docker Engine for Ubuntu
#8Can OP or an admin de-abbreviate "CS" to "Commercially-Supported"?
Re: Docker and Canonical Partner on Commercially-Supported Docker Engine for Ubuntu
#9thought Canonical is doing its own "docker", e.g. SNAP, lxd etc that are not totally identical but very similar to docker, what's going on here.
Re: Docker and Canonical Partner on Commercially-Supported Docker Engine for Ubuntu
#10thought Canonical is doing its own "docker", e.g. SNAP, lxd etc that are not totally identical but very similar to docker, what's going on here.
Similar in foundation, different in goals.