Facebook admits it must do more to stop the spread of misinformation
1–10 of 645 posts
Re: Facebook admits it must do more to stop the spread of misinformation
#2So they admit they want to censorship FB.
Re: Facebook admits it must do more to stop the spread of misinformation
#3So they admit they want to censorship FB.
Censorship of libel and intentional mischief is no vice.
Re: Facebook admits it must do more to stop the spread of misinformation
#4So they admit they want to censorship FB.
One person trying to censorship is another person's editorial policy.
Re: Facebook admits it must do more to stop the spread of misinformation
#5So they admit they want to censorship FB.
Censorship of libel and intentional mischief is no vice.
It's up to courts to decide whether something is libel or slander, not an algorithm or an engineer at Facebook.
Private communication / media organizations like Facebook deciding what's acceptable and what's not would only be censorship.
Re: Facebook admits it must do more to stop the spread of misinformation
#6The moderation of Facebook is outsourced to a select group of organizations, not unlike Twitter with their Trust and Safety Council.
https://about.twitter.com/safety/council
https://blog.twitter.com/2016/announcing-the-twitter-trust-s...
Unsurprisingly, Twitter's Safety Council members are predominantly left-leaning with ties to the (now defunct) Clinton campaign. I would presume there are plenty of seats to be filled now.
Re: Facebook admits it must do more to stop the spread of misinformation
#7So who's going to be Head of Truth at Facebook?
Re: Facebook admits it must do more to stop the spread of misinformation
#8Deleted.
Re: Facebook admits it must do more to stop the spread of misinformation
#9So they admit they want to censorship FB.
"waahhh somebody told me Breitbart is racist and now I'm being CENSORED"
Re: Facebook admits it must do more to stop the spread of misinformation
#10So they admit they want to censorship FB.
It makes sense to reduce the effect of "cottage industries" getting paid to misrepresent the popularity of certain topics. I wouldn't call that censorship.