Live data from Hacker News

Serverless Map/Reduce

tothestars.io

1–10 of 161 posts

Re: Serverless Map/Reduce

#4
Saw the presentation last week at ServerlessConf in London and it really looks very promising. The cost behind this solution is what will really make me check this out :)

P.S. Quoting the author: "As you can see for these queries, the reference implementation performs reasonably well; it's nowhere near Redshift performance for the same queries, but for the price it really can't be beat today"

Re: Serverless Map/Reduce

#5
post #2

If it doesn't run on a server, then what does this plumbing-work run on? Clickbait name?

The term "Serverless" means that you don't manage the servers, neither hardware nor virtual machines. Instead, you use exclusively AWS lambda and/or similar services.

I find that term confusing, too, but it seems to be well-established by now, so we have to live with that.

See also: http://martinfowler.com/articles/serverless.html

Re: Serverless Map/Reduce

#6
post #5
post #2

If it doesn't run on a server, then what does this plumbing-work run on? Clickbait name?

The term "Serverless" means that you don't manage the servers, neither hardware nor virtual machines. Instead, you use exclusively AWS lambda and/or similar services. I find that term confusing, too, but it seems to be well-established by now, so we have to live with that. See also: http://martinfowler.com/articles/serverless.html

Doesn't necessarily have to be through AWS. In fact, the Serverless Framework folks are working hard to make their framework suitable for other serverless service providers.

Re: Serverless Map/Reduce

#7
post #2

If it doesn't run on a server, then what does this plumbing-work run on? Clickbait name?

Oh come on. Is it still not accepted that "serverless" is the colloquial name for AWS Lambda and comparable services? Stop trying to make "FaaS" happen. It's not going to happen.

Re: Serverless Map/Reduce

#8
post #2

If it doesn't run on a server, then what does this plumbing-work run on? Clickbait name?

I understand the confusion, but the term "serverless" refers to the developer not having to provision and maintain a server like an EC2 instance themselves.

On AWS' side yes there are servers powering Lambda, but developers do not have worry about them at all. The code just runs.

Re: Serverless Map/Reduce

#9
post #5

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The term "Serverless" means that you don't manage the servers, neither hardware nor virtual machines. Instead, you use exclusively AWS lambda and/or similar services. I find that term confusing, too, but it seems to be well-established by now, so we have to live with that. See also: http://martinfowler.com/articles/serverless.html

Doesn't necessarily have to be through AWS. In fact, the Serverless Framework folks are working hard to make their framework suitable for other serverless service providers.

> Doesn't necessarily have to be through AWS

Please refrain from strawman arguments. I wrote "AWS lambda and/or similar services".

In the Fowler article, you find a nice classification of these services:

- BaaS (Backend as a Service)

- FaaS (Funciton as a Service)

Re: Serverless Map/Reduce

#10
post #9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Doesn't necessarily have to be through AWS. In fact, the Serverless Framework folks are working hard to make their framework suitable for other serverless service providers.

> Doesn't necessarily have to be through AWS Please refrain from strawman arguments. I wrote "AWS lambda and/or similar services". In the Fowler article, you find a nice classification of these services: - BaaS (Backend as a Service) - FaaS (Funciton as a Service)

Sorry :P read "exclusively AWS", and stopped reading!
Post reply on HN