Live data from Hacker News

Someone Is Learning How to Take Down the Internet

lawfareblog.com

1–10 of 143 posts

Re: Someone Is Learning How to Take Down the Internet

#2
This is both unsurprising, and worrying. Unsurprising because it's the job of any nation's military and espionage arms to consider and form plans to cripple or destroy their potential enemy's infrastructure, information included. Worrying, because as far as I can tell most people remain deeply ignorant and/or unconcerned (present company excluded both from that remark, and realistically the descriptor "most people") about 'cybersecurity' in any form.

That needs to change, and the author is right that while there seems to be little to do now, people should be aware of it.

Re: Someone Is Learning How to Take Down the Internet

#4
post #2

This is both unsurprising, and worrying. Unsurprising because it's the job of any nation's military and espionage arms to consider and form plans to cripple or destroy their potential enemy's infrastructure, information included. Worrying, because as far as I can tell most people remain deeply ignorant and/or unconcerned (present company excluded both from that remark, and realistically the descriptor "most people")…

'the author' (Bruce Schneier) is right a lot.

Re: Someone Is Learning How to Take Down the Internet

#6
post #3

Can anyone elaborate on what he means when he says that Verisign can 'go down' and take down most of the internet with it? How would a registrar going down affect anything to do with actual hosts?

If Verisign is running the nameservers for .com and .net, it will cause DNS problems across the board. We'd have to rely on DNS caches until new .net and .com nameservers come up. This would impact not only new domain registrations, but DR grade migrations, and DNSSEC.

If coordinated with an attack against the root nameservers so we couldn't change the .com and .net nameservers, DNS would become a real disaster. If combined with some BGP trickery, you could even see domain names being poisoned.

We should be able to be worked around the damage eventually; but so much of the internet relies on so few root servers/hosts/routers.

Re: Someone Is Learning How to Take Down the Internet

#7
post #3

Can anyone elaborate on what he means when he says that Verisign can 'go down' and take down most of the internet with it? How would a registrar going down affect anything to do with actual hosts?

Poor wording. Verisign operates .com for the US government. So if Verisign's .com servers were to go down, then .com would go down with them. The author shouldn't have used the word "registrar" which makes people think of the creation of new domain names, à la GANDI (good) or GoDaddy (bad).

Re: Someone Is Learning How to Take Down the Internet

#8
post #5

Makes me wonder if we'll ever see a "hot" war that starts off as a "cyber" war.

The start of every US war in the ME has featured attacks on communication and infrastructure, starting with hacking in to the telephone exchanges weeks or months before the hot war starts, and culminating with the takedown of critical physical infrastructure, like power, water, etc. as the first thing to go when the shooting starts.
Post reply on HN